The Scotsman

No punishment for Gloucester after concussed North played on

● World Rugby review rules medics were wrong but praises subsequent measures

-

World Rugby will not punish Northampto­n despite ruling that the club’s medics wrongfully let George North return to action after a suspected head injury against Leicester in December.

Rugby’s global governing body expressed “disappoint­ment” on Northampto­n’s failings, after North fell heavily following a tackle by Adam Thompstone in Aviva Premiershi­p action on 3 December.

World Rugby has insisted, however, that English authoritie­s acted quickly to avoid any repeat of a player returning to action after suffering a suspected concussion.

“Despite the failing by the club to correctly apply World Rugby’s head-injury management protocols, World Rugby has recognised that the RFU (Rugby Football Union) and PRL (Premiershi­p Rugby Limited) acted swiftly and appropriat­ely to implement measures with Northampto­n Saints and other clubs to reduce the probabilit­y of future noncomplia­nce,” read a World Rugby statement.

North appeared to be knocked unconsciou­s after landing heavily from Leicester wing Thompstone’s aerial challenge in the Tigers’ 19-11 league win at Welford Road.

The 24-year-old underwent a Head Injury Assessment (HIA) and returned to the fray, but World Rugby has now confirmed North should have been permanentl­y removed instead.

North was later stood down by Northampto­n, missing three weeks of action as he recovered from his latest head injury issue.

The Wales wing endured an

0 George North: Concussion protocol was not followed by club. enforced five-month break in November 2014 owing to a string of nasty concussion­s.

The RFU and Premiershi­p Rugby set up the first Concussion Management Review Group to investigat­e North’s latest head injury, that highlighte­d Northampto­n’s shortcomin­gs – but again stopped short of imposing any penalty.

World Rugby has now concluded its own review, claiming “highly constructi­ve” dialogue aimed at avoiding any repeat protocol breach.

“The robust head injury protocols defined within the tournament player welfare standards were not fully adhered to at the match in question,” the World Rugby statement went on. “Prioritisa­tion by the medical staff given to evaluating a potential spinal injury to North was advanced as the principal reason for the noncomplia­nce of head injury protocols.

“Therfuandp­rlhavecomm­unicated with all stakeholde­rs to remind them of their obligation­s to ensure that immediate and permanent removal is observed in all such cases. As part of the review, World Rugby is satisfied that Northampto­n Saints’ medical staff were educated on the permanent removal process.

“World Rugby recognises the actions taken by the RFU and PRL as appropriat­e in order to re-emphasise the protocols and are encouraged by the renewed efforts.

“While it is impossible to completely remove the risk of error, World Rugby remains disappoint­ed that there was a failure in this case to identify and manage the injury appropriat­ely, in particular considerin­g North’s medical history.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom