The Scotsman

SFA chief Regan says bigger World Cup is good for smaller nations

● Fifa move ‘positive for smaller nations’ ● Infantino expects £500m income boost

- By ALAN PATTULLO

Stewart Regan has welcomed ratificati­on of controvers­ial plans to expand the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams starting from the 2026 tournament, likely to be held in North America.

Despite widespread condemnati­on of the change, the Scottish Football Associatio­n chief executive hailed the expansion as a chance for smaller nations to make an impact on a high-profile stage.

“We believe this is a positive step, particular­ly for smaller nations, and will allow more fans across the globe to revel in their country’s participat­ion at a Fifa World Cup finals,” said Regan. “This will allow the nations to invest further in their footballin­g infrastruc­ture and youth developmen­t, which in turn can yield social benefits.”

Fifa, football’s world governing body, unanimousl­y approved the change at a meeting of its Council in Zurich yesterday. The number of tournament matches will rise to 80 from 64, with a first round likely to comprise 16 groups of three teams.

The change could possibly result in as much as £1 billion additional income for the organisers. However, Fifa president Gianni Infantino, who promised to make such changes when campaignin­g for his current position last year, said the primary motivation was a need to make the World Cup “more inclusive”. He noted that the winners will still play a total of seven games, as is the case now.

“We are in the 21st century and we have to shape the football World Cup of the 21 st century,” said Infantino, who is up for re-election in 2019.

“It is the future. Football is more than just South America and Europe, football is global.

“The football fever you have in a country that qualifies for the World Cup is the biggest promotiona­l tool for football you can have. This football promotion, in many parts of the world where today they have no chance to play [at the World Cup], was at the top of our thoughts.”

Fifa’s own research predicts revenue will increase to £5.29bn due to the extra matches, giving a potential profit rise of £521m.

But important details such as how many countries from each of the six confederat­ions in Fifa will get the extra qualificat­ions slots have still to be agreed. Uefa, who support the move, want the number of participat­ing European countries to increase from 13 to 16.

There is also no confirmati­on of whether penalty shoot-outs will decide drawn first-round matches, as has been reported. Only 16 of the 48 teams will go out at the first stage. Infantino said a decision on the competitio­n rules could wait until as late as 2024.

“No guarantees have been made,” he added. “The only sure thing is that everyone will have a bit more [representa­tion] than they have today.”

Regan was in accord with the Fifa president. “We are pleased with the news that the Fifa World Cup will expand to 48 teams from 2026,” said the SFA chief executive.

“A greater eclectic mix of footballin­g cultures at the Fifa World Cup will create a bigger and better atmosphere than ever before.”

The English FA took a more circumspec­t view, releasing a statement in which they asked for time to digest the potential ramificati­ons and gather more informatio­n on how the tournament would work.

“The priority has to be considerat­ion of the potential impact on fans, players, teams and leagues, and also recognitio­n of the importance of sporting integrity and commercial viability,” said an FA statement.

The 2022 World Cup, already

mired in controvers­y due to its contentiou­s location in Qatar and scheduled start in late November, will be the last in the current format.

The European Club Associatio­n was among the many outspoken objectors, complainin­g that the extra teams will dilute competitiv­eness and place players at risk of exhaustion. “We fail to see the merits to changing the current format of 32 that has proven to be the perfect formula from all perspectiv­es,” the associatio­n said in a statement.

It is the third time in 35 years that a World Cup has increased in size. The 1982 tournament, in Spain, expanded from 16 to 24 teams and then in 1998, from 24 to 32 teams.

That competitio­n, hosted by France, was the last time the Scotland men’s team reached a major final – the women’s team have reached this summer’s Euros.

The increasing desperatio­n to qualify informs some of the reaction to the move, with former SFA chief executive Gordon Smith, pictured, who resigned in 2010, admitting he would have voted for the change, too. “I was very much in favour of increasing the European [Championsh­ips] to 32 and I would vote for this,” he said. “It does give us more chance [to qualify] and also gives a bit more excitement to matches during the qualifying rounds, too.”

However, Hamish Husband, spokesman for the West of Scotland Tartan Army, was against the expansion move, despite the change, in theory, handing Scotland a greater chance of reaching a World Cup. “The World Cup should be for the very best teams, plus a few others,” he said. “You can be parochial and say it increases our chances but some of us older generation believe we should be good enough to qualify anyway, like at Germany, Argentina and Spain. The challenge should be Scotland having a team good enough to qualify for a 32-team World Cup.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 0 Fifa president Gianni Infantino, below right, announced the changes to the format of the World Cup.
0 Fifa president Gianni Infantino, below right, announced the changes to the format of the World Cup.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? STEWART REGAN “We believe this is a positive step, particular­ly for smaller nations”
STEWART REGAN “We believe this is a positive step, particular­ly for smaller nations”
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom