The Scotsman

Own your goals

-

The new SFA and SPFL regulation­s on “Unacceptab­le Conduct”will do little to tackle the endemic problems Scottish football faces such as lifethreat­ening flares, pitch invasions, sectarian singing, effigies, smoke bombs, offensive banners, stadium damage, football violence and the like. These are experience­s most clubs never encounter.

They have everything to do with appeasing Michael Matheson, the Justice Secretary who, last June, threatened that Holyrood would intervene if the Scottish football authoritie­s did not put their house in order.

Yes, the regulation­s are very worthy, as were the Offensive Behaviour Act and the Bowen Report. They have all failed, and will continue to fail, because they make the fans liable and not the club.

The “Unacceptab­le Conduct” regulation­s are imposing an unnecessar­y financial and administra­tive burden on the clubs. Dunfermlin­e Athletic are a good example. This is a club which will send 20002500 fans to two matches each at, say, Raith Rovers, Falkirk and Hibernian. However, the unpaid staff in the club shop will now have to take the names and addresses of all those buying tickets on nonmatch days. Not surprising­ly, Dunfermlin­e were one of just four clubs who submitted a response to these changes.

Obviously, troublemak­ers will slip through the net by showing up on the day of the match. The answer is simple. Scottish Football needs to come into line with the rest of Uefa, including England and Wales, and bring in strict liability. Uefa has a framework which has worked successful­ly because it has teeth. If a stand is shut, the next match played behind closed doors, fines are imposed, points are deducted or a club removed

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom