Radcliffe hits out at plans to wipe world records list

Paula Radcliffe has angrily attacked plans to rewrite world records in athletics as disrespectful and an insult to the dignity of clean athletes.

Under proposals put forward by European Athletics, all marks set before 2005 would be wiped from the books, regardless of the athlete involved, in a bid to eliminate any doping doubts surrounding past performances.

The proposals would need the approval of world governing body the IAAF to come into force, but president Lord Coe has already given his initial backing to the idea.

World marathon record holder Radcliffe, 43, whose mark of two hours 15 minutes 25 seconds, set in 2003, would be wiped out under the plans, told BBC Radio 5 Live: “Even though they will always stand as our personal bests, it’s very hard to be told: ‘We don’t value your record, we don’t believe and respect it and we can’t trust it’.

“We worked extremely hard for those records, we feel that they’re a reflection of us, a reflection of the hard work and the integrity and the work of the whole team around us put in to those performances and being proud of those performances because they’re clean performances.”

Under the new standards, a world record would only be recognised if it met three key criteria: it was achieved at a competition on a list of approved international events where the highest standards of officiating and technical equipment can be guaranteed; the athlete had been subject to an agreed number of doping control tests in the months leading up to it; and the doping control sample taken after the record was stored and available for re-testing for ten years.

Crucially, the IAAF has only stored blood and urine samples since 2005.

Jonathan Edwards’ triple jump world record of 18.29 metres – set in 1995 – is also in danger of being erased. Colin Jackson, who has held the 60m hurdles world record of 7.30secs since 1994, branded the proposals “ridiculous”.