The Scotsman

Election result can pave way for cross-party involvemen­t in Brexit negotiatio­ns

-

If we have learned anything from the general election, we now know that there is little appetite in the country for the aggressive tough line that the Prime Minister has claimed she will take in the negotiatio­n with the European Union.

Nor do voters like her exclusive approach, where she is unwilling to work with other politician­s from around the country and from different parties, even from within the wider Conservati­ve Party.

But the finely balanced result provides the opportunit­y to change the approach to the negotiatio­ns to a much more inclusive, consensual approach across all parties, as Ruth Davidson seems to be suggesting. It could be based on reaching out to the European Union negotiator­s, who have always said that they want an outcome which is satisfacto­ry to all parties. Now we have the chance to have that kind of negotiatio­ns.

Practicall­y speaking, this means that the Prime Minister should involve representa­tives of the other political parties in the negotiatio­ns. This would allow their concerns to be expressed, but importantl­y it would also allow all to hear the views of the European Union negotiator­s and explore options with them.

While this would not be easy to manage, it is likely to lead to a much greater degree of consensus across the UK parties.

I assume that the Prime Minister has the right to nominate whom she wishes to be part of the negotiatin­g team and the EU would not object if it was a cross-party team rather than a small group from within one party. She and her government would still have the final decision about the final agreement, as in the end the negotiatio­ns are between the EU and the UK government.

But when it reached that stage it is much more likely that the government would have cross-party support, as they had in the vote to trigger the negotiatio­ns under Article 50 – not forgetting that they had to be forced into doing the vote by the courts.

And on the principle that two heads are better than one, we would have a much better agreement for them to coalesce around.

Sadly, the Prime Minister seems unwilling to take this more conciliato­ry, collegiate approach to other parties, even though she has been given a salutary lesson. But the message is clear that the current approach has been rejected by the electorate and we must press for this alternativ­e.

CLEM MCCARTNEY Seacoast Road, Limavady

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom