The Scotsman

No Scottish veto

-

Once again commentato­rs have incorrectl­y highlighte­d the potential for Holyrood to veto the Great Repeal Bill and therefore Brexit.

The issue has arisen once more because there is discussion again over the prospect that the Brexit Bill might require an accompanyi­ng Legislativ­e Consent Motion (LCM) at Holyrood. That is because departing from the European Union impinges upon powers – such as justice and agricultur­e – which are devolved to Edinburgh.

However, an LCM does not amount to a veto, and the Scottish Government, contrary to misconcept­ions, has never at any point claimed it had a potential veto over Brexit.

The LCM builds upon the original Sewel Convention, which is just that, a convention with no statutory force. This was reinforced in January by the decision of the UK Supreme Court when it ruled on the procedures required in order to trigger Article 50, the formal notice that the UK intended to leave the EU.

Westminste­r is and remains sovereign and MPS can legislate as they choose, including in devolved areas. That was made plain when the Scottish Parliament was establishe­d and remains relevant today.

However, the UK government, particular­ly in its current weakened state, will not want to roll over the devolved administra­tions. It could legally, but it will not want to politicall­y, and there is clearly a deal that will require to be done here.

The Scottish Government will be more inclined to consent to the Bill if it is granted a real role in the Brexit negotiatio­ns themselves, with a place in the UK negotiatin­g team, perhaps with a seat at the top table when devolved matters are being discussed with the European Commission.

The ball is well and truly in the UK government’s court, but given its current weakened position it would be perilous to ignore the desires of the devolved administra­tions.

ALEX ORR Leamington Terrace, Edinburgh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom