The Scotsman

Scotrail could be in public hands if political thinking takes a different track

Duncan Thorp puts forward the case for a social enterprise model

-

Britain’s railways are very much at the heart of our country. They’ve transforme­d our way of life. Through the years of fragmented, privately-run lines, to state ownership, the massive closures of the 1960s Beeching cuts and then back to privatisat­ion, the railways have been through much upheaval.

But through all the many changes in new technologi­es, ownership models, tragedies and successes, one factor has remained. That is the lack of democracy.

You may think this means nationalis­ation. With the old British Rail, state-owned trains were directed by, and accountabl­e to, elected politician­s. Perhaps we should bring that back? Or perhaps the dynamic busi- ness model of shareholde­r ownership is the way forward. Anyone can buy shares, right?

However, neither of these options works in the real world. Through decades of transforma­tion, the voice of rail employees and the public has remained at the sidelines. This is bizarre. The actual experts – passengers and workers – have little say in running our railways.

Privatisat­ion of Britain’s railways has not been successful. Support for public ownership is consistent­ly high. A small number of people have become wealthy and vast sums of taxpayers’ money is still being used to subsidise private firms. Profiteeri­ng of public transport can never work in the public interest.

So what about the great British Rail? In later years the financiall­ystarved and creaking rolling stock meant that it was not so great. A 1970s, centralise­d, top-down system lacked dynamism. Of course, in preparatio­n for privatisat­ion, public services are deliberate­ly underfunde­d. However, British Rail was never owned by the public, it was owned by the state. These are not the same thing.

In Scotland and elsewhere our railways have been in the media for all the wrong reasons. Cancelled trains and broken ticket machines don’t build confidence in operators like Abellio Scotrail. However, it’s easy to attack without understand­ing the complex issues – and without suggesting alternativ­es.

The supreme irony is that while Scotland’s trains are privatised, they are run by a Dutch government company, with profits going to their public coffers.

So what other options are there? Contrary to political debate, these are unlimited. Unfortunat­ely policy chatter about public services only ever remains within a narrow window of privatisat­ion vs. the state. We need to get off that hamster wheel. We need some imaginatio­n.

The Scottish Government is weighing up options, including a public sector bid. The Scotrail franchise reaches the half-way point in 2018. There is scope for a review but UK Government legislatio­n means that there must still be an open tender when the contract ends.

So what could that alternativ­e look

like? Scotland’s railways could be transforme­d into a new, national social enterprise, owned by the people. It’s not a question of left-wing or right-wing – we can’t have the social without the enterprise and vice versa. This would have strong public support, a vote winner for any party.

We should of course have a first class rail network for everyone. This would mean rail passengers on the company board and no private shareholde­rs. The company should be democratic, a business managed by employees, with elected directors, getting rid of top-down centralisa­tion. It’s certainly vital that we have a financiall­y sustainabl­e company – a profitable, independen­t and responsive business and a partnershi­p of both public and social investment. Train fares from paying customers plus public funding would be needed (as is currently the case with subsidies to the private sector operators).

It should be an integrated company too, one that runs track and trains. Integratio­n, flexibilit­y and democratic accountabi­lity would ensure a smoother running service, reduce wasteful duplicatio­n and also confusion for passengers.

The company should be ethical, with a specific remit to put people and positive social/environmen­tal impact at the core of the business. It would be rooted in local communitie­s and work in genuine partnershi­p with other social enterprise­s and SMES. If we took forward these core, guiding principles we could have a much improved railway. We would also have a brilliant, new, social enterprise business. Now is the right time to build a social enterprise rail service for Scotland – and across the UK. Duncan Thorp, policy and communicat­ions officer, Social Enterprise Scotland.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom