The Scotsman

Choppy seas ahead for our fishermen

The end of the Common Fisheries Policy post-brexit won’t result in a sudden outbreak of peace amongst Scotland’s various fishing interests, argues Dr James Fenton

-

The sea, or the grander sounding marine environmen­t, has been much in the news recently: the announceme­nt that the UK will be leaving the 1964 London Fisheries Convention, post-brexit fishing policy, trawling damage to the seabed off Plockton, the use of chemicals in fish farms . . .

The sea is of course familiar to us all – waves, distant horizons and boats bobbing on the surface – but at the same time totally alien. For fundamenta­lly we are terrestria­l species and have little interest or understand­ing of what happens beneath the waves: out of sight, out of mind.

In practice it is very difficult for a fisherman to stop catching fish, and to be told by outsiders to stop fishing must be irksome, particular­ly as fishermen are fiercely independen­t and the best fisherman has always been seen as the one who catches the most. But history tells us that unregulate­d fisherman tend only to stop fishing when there are no fish left – think of the once-thriving cod fishery off the Grand Banks.

Farmers of course have long learnt that they have to keep back some of their seed to plant next year’s crop, but this is relatively straightfo­rward compared to fishermen having to calculate how many fish to leave in the sea as breeding stock. Hence the growth of fisheries science as a discipline, although the scientists are widely condemned by fishermen.

Unfortunat­ely modern technology has made fishing too easy: a large modern trawler can hoover up the same amount of fish in an afternoon that a whole fleet would have taken a summer to catch. Thus mathematic­s comes into it: either we can have a few large boats or many small ones. Modern fisheries management is really about making fishing less effective, whether by restrictin­g catch (quotas), allowing more fish to escape (mesh size) or reduction in effort (days tied up).

Fish are highly mobile species, moving from one country’s jurisdicti­on to another, so it makes sense to share the resource: isolationi­st Scottish policy is not only selfish but will create rancour. Interestin­gly, many UK trawler owners have sold their quotas to foreign nationals (and then complain about Spanish boats fishing in UK waters) and many Scottish trawlers are manned by a largely foreign crew: so why the dislike of foreigners?

And it is not as if any love is lost between the different types of fishing within Scottish waters. In the west, east coast trawlers have tended to be seen as predatory beings sweeping up everything in their nets and damaging the livelihood­s of the inshore fisherman. And today even within inshore fishermen there is conflict between those using mobile gear, i.e. dragging nets over the seabed as in scallop dredging, and those using static gear such as lobster creels. With the recent talk of six and 12-mile limits, I think there is a strong case for bringing back the not rawling three-mile limit.

Economic analysis indicates that the local economy benefits more from having many small boats than a few large ones, but it is the large east coast trawlers which tend to have the ear of government.

Exiting the Common Fisheries Policy is not going to result in a sudden outbreak of peace amongst the various fishing interests. ● Dr James Fenton was the National Trust for Scotland’s first ecologist, and worked on landscape policy with Scottish Natural Heritage. He is also former CEO of Falklands Conservati­on and an ecology consultant. He lives in Oban.

power dress for fun – look at those shoes – where they were historical­ly agnostic and Boris de Pfeffel Johnson has a mercurial couture highwire act his acolytes love.

None of these leaders dress like their followers, which is smart, right and respectful.

“Gentlemen, if you need to wear brown shoes look out the window and see if you are in Barcelona” speaks to the “no brown in town” trope that in the City used to imply casualness.

I own brown shoes – dark, lace-up, immaculate. But scuffed tan slipons with the worn heel convince me only that you are selling a sevenyear-old high mileage Ford Fiesta in maroon. To make the right impression, we should all be reflecting on how well we’re shod.

The good news is the world does not really care how you dress, it barely even notices; until it needs to notice. Then it judges.

We can be bolder and badder than ever in our business dress, but if you are smart you will be smart when being smart. You will be a little more conservati­ve than you would like and a little more expensive than you can afford. You will be immaculate and wear clothes that fit your body shape. And you will know you won’t be taken seriously in poor-quality shoes. ● Russell Wardrop, CEO of Kissing With Confidence, coaches business leaders in presentati­onal skills.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 0 Nicola Sturgeon’s tartan high heels exemplify power dressing
0 Nicola Sturgeon’s tartan high heels exemplify power dressing

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom