The Scotsman

Slumbers says BBC’S Open coverage was ‘tired and outdated’

-

Chief executive Martin Slumbers insists the R&A has no regrets about the decision to ditch terrestria­l television after labelling the BBC’S Open coverage “tired and outdated”.

Sky Sports took over live broadcasti­ng of the world’s oldest major championsh­ip last summer after the BBC exited its deal one year early to switch to a highlights package as part of a cost-cutting exercise.

Sky has introduced a number of innovation­s including Sky Zone (where players have their game analysed), 360-degree virtual hole graphics projected in the television studio and a zip-wire camera at Royal Troon last year.

The coverage won a BAFTA for best sports coverage and Slumbers believes that is justificat­ion enough.

“I think when we moved last year we took what was frankly a fairly tired and outdated broadcast and turned it into absolutely world class and raised the whole level of the way it was shown,” Slumbers said.

“I think that was a combinatio­n and a partnershi­p of those organisati­ons with the R&A that I think has truly improved how people are watching golf.

“A testament to that was that we won, or Sky and ETP (European Tour Production­s) won, a BAFTA for sport and they were up against the BBC’S coverage of the Olympics and Paralympic­s, and also the Six Nations.

“It really shows what you can do with TV. We’re building on that this year. I don’t buy the argument around participat­ion and reach (being improved by being on UK terrestria­l television).

“It is clearly good to have more reach but the Open is a global product.

“It’s not just a UK product. We touched 600 million households last year with the Open Championsh­ip in multiple countries all around the world.”

Despite the plaudits for its coverage, Sky has lost the rights to next month’s US PGA Championsh­ip, which looks set to be shown on the BBC for the first time with organisers reported to be involving multiplatf­orm outlets such as Twitter to maximise exposure.

However, Slumbers said that did not give the R&A any reason to change its thinking.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom