The Scotsman

Watchdog allows controvers­ial ‘milk is inhumane’ advert

- By ILONA AMOS

The complainan­ts, some with experience of working in the dairy industry, challenged whethercla­imsmadeint­head were misleading and could be substantia­ted.

They felt the ad also suggested there were widespread breaches of UK welfare regulation­s in dairy farming.

Go Vegan World campaigner­s argued the ad did not state or imply that calves were separated from their mothers earlier than the 12 to 24 hours recommende­d by the UK government’s Department for Environmen­t, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

Furthermor­e, they said the exact timing of separation was irrelevant to the ad, which was designed to highlight the injustice of separating cow and calf in the first place.

Clearing the ad, the ASA said it understood complainan­ts were concerned that it implied a significan­t number of dairy farms did not comply with animal welfare standards, and milkproduc­tionwasthe­refore “inhumane” as a result.

But it concluded: “Although the language used to express the claims was emotional and hard-hitting, we understood it was the case that calves were generally separated from their mothers very soon after birth, and we therefore concluded that the ad was unlikely to materially mislead readers.”

Sandra Higgins, director of Go Vegan World, said: “The aim of the ad is to let people know that no matter where the milk and dairy products they

0 Complaints were made over the Go Vegan World advert purchase have come from, whether an industrial-scale dairy farm or a smallholdi­ng, for each cow legal, standard practice necessitat­es her pregnancy, the removal of her calf, and her slaughter, so that we can drink the milk that she produced to feed her infant.

“The ad highlights that the problem faced by animals in the dairy industry is not how they are treated, but that they are used at all.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom