Refugee realism

The latest calls for the UK to take more Syrian refugees come in the context of an ongoing lack of clear thinking on the issue.

Ninety per cent of Syrian refugees are in the nations surrounding Syria, in states that lack the resources to meet their needs. Financial assistance here brings huge humanitarian returns. The wildly disproportionate sums spent on the wealthier and fitter 10% of refugees who manage to reach richer nations might be admirable, but it is illogical to encourage this gross disparity of investment. The well-being of the 90 per cent around Syria is not less important than the 10 per cent seeking relative prosperity in Europe. Why is $135 invested in each refugee in Europe, for every $1 spent to help each one around Syria?

The reconstruction of a nation after conflict can be severely hampered if refugees do not return, especially the young and educated – those most likely to be seeking to settle in Europe.

Providing for a meaningful life in neighbouring areas is the best way to help refugees and their states. This is cost effective, avoids cultural assimilation challenges, and helps the state rebuild when the crisis passes.

RICHARD LUCAS

Scottish Family Party, Bath Street,

Glasgow