The Scotsman

Scots Tories to work with SNP on Brexit bill changes

●Party north of the Border could lend support to repeal bill amendments

- By PARIS GOURTSOYAN­NIS Westminste­r Correspond­ent

Theresa May’s flagship Brexit legislatio­n faces a fresh challenge after Ruth Davidson’s deputy said the Scottish Conservati­ves were prepared to back SNP demands for amendments.

Jackson Carlaw said Scottish Tories would consider signing up to a list of proposed amendments from the Scottish and Welsh government­s to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill set to be unveiled in the coming days.

With Tory rebels already organising to force changes to the legislatio­n that would enact Brexit, opposition from Ms Davidson would pose a serious challenge to Mrs May’s minority government.

Nationalis­ts claim the so-called Repeal Bill will “wreck devolution” by retaining certain EU powers in devolved areas, such as agricultur­e and the environmen­t, to prevent different regulatory regimes producing trade barriers within the UK after Brexit.

The Scottish Government is this week also set to reveal a list of more than 100 powers that will be “grabbed” by Westminste­r if the bill is passed unamended, it is understood.

Scottish Secretary David Mundell

Boris Johnson faced criticism over his 4,000-word blueprint for a “glorious” Brexit yesterday, with Amber Rudd accusing him of “backseat driving” and the head of the UK Statistics Authority condemning repetition of claims that leaving the EU will generate £350 million a week for the NHS.

But the Foreign Secretary was also backed by a number of Cabinet colleagues, adding weight to suggestion­s that his interventi­on in a newspaper article represents a challenge to Theresa May’s leadership of the Conservati­ve Party.

The Prime Minister’s allies said Mr Johnson would keep his job and suggested “people should calm down” despite his comments potentiall­y underminin­g a major speech on Brexit by Mrs May this week.

Asked about the article on the Andrew Marr Show, Ms Rudd said she had been “too busy” dealing with the Parsons Green bomb attack to read it and criticised Mr Johnson for releasing the piece at the time of the blast.

Mrs Rudd, a Remain supporter, crossed swords with him during the EU referendum campaign, describing him as “not the man you want driving you home”.

She said yesterday: “What I meant by that is, I don’t want him managing the Brexit process.”

Mrs Rudd insisted the Prime Minister is “driving the car” and, when pressed on Mr Johnson’s actions, said: “You could call it backseat driving.”

She described her colleague as an “irrepressi­ble enthusiast” on Brexit who brought “enthusiasm, energy and sometimes entertainm­ent” to the Cabinet.

However, Sir David Norgrove, head of the statistics watchdog, was less impressed, writing to Mr Johnson to say he was “surprised and disappoint­ed” he had revived the widely discredite­d referendum pledge that up to £350m a week extra could be spent on the NHS after Brexit and called it a “clear misuse” of official figures.

On Friday, Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson led criticism of Mr Johnson, posting on Twitter: “On the day of a terror attack where Britons were maimed, just hours after the threat level is raised, our only thoughts should be on service.”

Mrs Rudd said yesterday she “has a point”.

Mr Johnson’s decision to release the article six days before Mrs May is due to set out her plans for Brexit in a speech in Florence prompted claims by allies of the Prime Minister that the move was “hostile” and “attentions­eeking”.

But amid the furore, Mr Johnson insisted in a tweet he was “looking forward to PM’S Florence speech”.

He added: “All behind Theresa for a glorious Brexit.” He was reported to have the backing of senior Cabinet ministers Michael Gove, who infamously betrayed him during his abortive leadership bid last year, and Priti Patel.

Mrs May’s de facto deputy Damian Green said Mr Johnson would not be sacked over his interventi­on. The First Secretary of State told Sunday With Paterson on Sky News: “No, he isn’t and the reason is, he, like the rest of the Cabinet, like the Prime Minister, is all about wanting to get the best deal for the British people.”

The SNP’S Westminste­r leader Ian Blackford suggested parliament should be recalled so Mrs May could clarify the government’s Brexit stance for MPS.

Mr Blackford said: “It is clear that the Tory Cabinet remains bitterly divided over the UK’S Brexit negotiatin­g position – a completely untenable position for the UK government to maintain at such an important crossroads for the country.

“With senior government ministers openly backing opposing and incompatib­le Brexit positions while the negotiatio­ns are ongoing, Theresa May must urgently clarify who speaks for the UK government and whether the UK’S negotiatin­g position has changed. It would be unacceptab­le if changes to the UK’S negotiatin­g position were to be announced in Florence, with no parliament­ary scrutiny.”

0 Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson’s blueprint for a ‘glorious’ Brexit

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom