Vatican official faces sex abuse charges in Australian court
Cardinal George Pell, the most senior Catholic official to face sex offence charges, was jeered by protesters as he made a court appearance in his native Australia yesterday in a case that has rocked the Vatican and placed scrutiny on the pope’s stance against abusive clergy.
Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic and Pope Francis’ top financial adviser, Pell entered the Melbourne Magistrates Court flanked by police and media as a small group of placard-waving protesters yelled from the sidewalk. He did not react to the hecklers.
The 20-minute hearing focused on planning for the committal hearing that will determine whether he goes to trial. As many as 50 witnesses could be called for that proceeding, expected to last a month.
Pell, who remained silent throughout, has been charged with multiple offences involving multiple complainants. The exact detail and nature of the charges have not been disclosed, though police have described them as “historical” sexual assault offences.
Pell through his lawyer has vowed to fight the charges. The 76-year-old cardinal has taken leave from his position as Vatican treasurer to return to Australia and defend himself. He has not been required to enter a plea in court, though his attorney said at his first court appearance in July that Pell intended to plead not guilty.
Pell’s attorney, Robert Richter, told yesterday’s hearing at least one of the allegations could not have happened.
“We propose to demonstrate to Your Honour that what was alleged was impossible,” Richter told magistrate Belinda Wallington.
Yesterday’s brief hearing centred on which witnesses would be cross-examined at the committal hearing, and touched on a factor likely to feature prominently in the case - the memories of witnesses speaking about incidents alleged to have occurred up to several decades ago.
Richter pointed out one witness had given police a “vague” statement. Wallington noted the man was aged 11 at the time. “We’re dealing with historical events. Memory’s not static,” Wallington said.
The magistrate refused Pell’s lawyers permission to crossexamine five witnesses they had hoped to question, but granted permission for them to cross-examine dozens of others at the committal hearing, saying it was appropriate to allow those witnesses’ memories to be “further explored”.
Outside the court, protester Helen Dawson said: “This trial is a very important display that the days of special privileges for high-ranking religious officials are finished and gone.”
newsdestkts@scotsman.com