The Scotsman

Anger over teaching nursery children about consent

- By TOM PETERKIN Political Editor

The Scottish Government is to investigat­e how the concept of “consent” is taught to nurseryage­d children, according to a document outlining its strategy to prevent violence against women and girls.

Academics and family groups last night expressed alarm at the proposal, arguing that it was “ridiculous” to teach children as young as two or three about consent.

The row erupted after the Scottish Government published its document Equally Safe: A delivery plan for Scotland’s strategy to prevent and eradicate violence against women and girls.

The plan includes measures to teach schoolchil­dren the importance of consent and healthy relationsh­ips and will see Rape Crisis Scotland’s sexual violence prevention programme rolled out across a further 11 local authoritie­s.

The plan, which contains 118 actions, also includes an “Equally Safe” accreditat­ion scheme which will be developed for employers to promote best practice in tackling gender-based violence in the workforce, including sexual harassment.

But it was the section of the document suggesting that “early years” – meaning preschool-aged children – should be taught “consent” that caused controvers­y.

In a section dealing with the Scottish Government’s review of personal social education (PSE), the document listed a series of action plans to make progress when it comes to tackling violence against women.

One section said: “Through a review of PSE, investigat­e how consent is taught within early years, primary and secondary schools.”

Dr Stuart Waiton, a senior lecturer in sociology at Abertay University, said it would be “ridiculous” for very young children to be taught about consent.

“This is very troubling,” Dr Waiton said. “One of the key things about a child’s developmen­t is having private space where they are free to make mistakes and learn from them. It is how you grow up.

“It is right to tell children about boundaries. But the presumptio­n seems to be that we need to teach children otherwise they will become violent which is a fairly grotesque presumptio­n particular­ly about children, especially small children.

“It would seem to be inappropri­ate to say the least in terms of the age, the younger children who don’t even know what sex is or what relationsh­ips are. But they don’t seem to be able to leave this alone – they’ve got an obsession with early invention even when it makes no sense.

“It is very natural for young children to touch and cuddle and it almost as if they want to make that into something that is toxic.”

Norman Wells, director of the Family Education Trust, said: “Politician­s need to recognise that the school curriculum cannot provide the answer to every social ill.

“To prematurel­y introduce the minds of young children to thoughts and behaviours that are completely alien to their knowledge and experience would only confuse and disturb them unnecessar­ily.”

A Scottish Government spokeswoma­n rejected the criticisms and said: “We do not accept these claims.

“It is vital that children and young people gain knowledge of healthy relationsh­ips and behaviour and this pilot of the whole schools approach engages children, staff and parents talk about this and wider gender equality issues.”

“The presumptio­n seems to be that we need to teach children otherwise they will become violent which is a fairly grotesque presumptio­n”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom