The Scotsman

Budget blow for National Gallery revamp

● Start date and final cost of troubled project are still unknown

- By BRIAN FERGUSON Arts Correspond­ent

A long-awaited overhaul of Scotland’s flagship art gallery is set to go millions of pounds over budget – despite being dramatical­ly scaled back in a bid to keep its cost down.

The National Galleries of Scotland has admitted it does not yet how much the revamp of its historic home at the Mound in Edinburgh will cost.

Bosses have revealed they might have to go back to the Scottish Government to ask for more financial help on the project, which has an official price tag of £16.8 million.

And they admitted they will have to seek fresh planning permission after abandoning plans to extend the complex into Princes Street Gardens – more than a year after the previous scheme was backed by councillor­s.

The booming constructi­on market in Edinburgh city centre, where work is under way on a number of major developmen­ts, and the impact of Brexit have been blamed for the expected hike in the cost of the project.

A final budget and fundraisin­g targets will not be set until the tendering process for the project is complete. Work may not now get under way until the end of 2018 – almost two years later than envisaged.

However, Sir John Leighton, director-general of NGS, insisted he was hopeful the project, first announced in 2014, will be finished by 2020.

The overhaul is predicted to double the amount of space for Scottish art treasures on the Mound following years of complaints that they were hidden away in a “dead end” basement, where less than 20 per cent visitors venture.

When the project was officially launched just over a year ago it was said to be aimed at tackling the “institutio­nal embarrassm­ent” of how work by the likes of Allan Ramsay, Sirhenryra­eburn,alexander Nasmyth and Phoebe Anna Traquair is displayed.

But it emerged in May that extending the existing 19th century building by around five metres had been ruled out due to the concerns over the cost and complexity of building above railway tunnels.

Sir John said: “We’re hoping to go back in for planning permission later this year. Once we have the necessary approvals, we’ll go out to tender. We’ll only then be able to say with a degree of precision what the schedule of work and price will be. I’m not going to give an indicative cost. It will be more than the figure we gave before. How much more than that I can’t say just now. But we’ll be trying to keep as close to £16.8m as we possibly can.

“The HLF have reconfirme­d their support for the project. We will not be going back to them. The Scottish Government remains extremely supportive. We’re still working to an end date in 2020. We’re hoping to make some time back as the new scheme, in constructi­on terms, will be simpler.

“A lot depends on how long the planning process takes. We’re hoping it will be relatively simple, but who knows?

“A lot will also depend on where the market is with the tenders we are putting out and how long they take to negotiate. It’s very difficult to put a precise time on that.

“The constructi­on market was much more stable when we went out to tender the last time. A whole lot of uncertaint­ies have entered into the frame since then, not least Brexit, and its impact on the cost of raw materials and constructi­on. But by this time next year I’d hope we would have contractor­s on site and spades in the ground.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Left: Jane Avril, 1899, by Henri de Toulouse-lautrec; above and top, Girl at a Window and The Mill (detail) by Rembrandt; right, Rosetta II by Jenny Saville
Left: Jane Avril, 1899, by Henri de Toulouse-lautrec; above and top, Girl at a Window and The Mill (detail) by Rembrandt; right, Rosetta II by Jenny Saville

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom