The Scotsman

Resolution on LBTT anomaly

-

For many years those who held commercial properties in Scotland within their self-invested pension schemes (SIPP or SSAS schemes) were able to transfer commercial property between pension providers without any liability to stamp duty land tax, or stamp duty before that.

The advent of land and buildings transactio­n tax (LBTT), which replaced stamp duty land tax in Scotland in 2015, changed the landscape. Revenue Scotland took the view that such a transfer of commercial property between pension providers for the same beneficiar­y was liable to LBTT. Its interpreta­tion was that such a transfer was a “land transactio­n”, with the chargeable considerat­ion being the assumption by the new pension provider of the obligation­s owed to the pension member. This was despite the wording in Scotland being identical to that in England and Wales, with the result that the same transactio­n governed by identical wording was, therefore, being treated in opposite ways by Revenue Scotland and HMRC in England and Wales.

This inconsiste­ncy was damaging to the pensions industry in Scotland. Consumer choice was restricted and pension investors were stuck with providers who they felt were too expensive or not providing the service required. Representa­tions were made by us to challenge Revenue Scotland’s position. Revenue Scotland initially stood its ground, before announcing at its LBTT Forum in April that updated guidance would be produced. It was finally made available on 28 December 2017.

It was the news the industry had hoped for – Revenue Scotland has conceded the issue, and the position has reverted to the previous treatment of such transactio­ns. It confirmed that “in-specie” transfers will no longer be seen as “chargeable” and in a statement said, “following further representa­tions on the matter, while such transfers are still considered to be land transactio­ns, debt in the form of the liability assumed to pay benefits to pension scheme beneficiar­ies will not generally be considered to be given as chargeable considerat­ion in relation to such transactio­ns.”

This means Scotland has been placed once again on an equal footing with England and Wales. The decision brings back extra flexibilit­y to transferri­ng properties that are already held in a SIPP or SSAS.

In addition, Revenue Scotland will apply its new position both prospectiv­ely and retrospect­ively, meaning many savers could potentiall­y be in line for sizeable rebates, as Revenue Scotland refunds any LBTT paid on such property transactio­ns. Now that this anomaly between jurisdicti­ons has been removed, the industry can move forward with a sense of clarity. ● Fergus Mcdiarmid is a partner at law firm Morton Fraser

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom