The Scotsman

Trump warns Russia to ‘get ready’ for air strikes

●Prime Minister Theresa May opens door for Britain to join attack on Syria

- By ANGUS HOWARTH

Prime Minister Theresa May has paved the way for the UK to join the US in missile attacks on Syria as she blamed the Assad regime for the Douma gas attack on Saturday which killed at least 40 people.

She said “all the indication­s” were that the Syrian regime was behind the attack on its own people as the US prepares to launch air strikes.

The Prime Minister did not indicate openly whether Britain would be involved in the military campaign but insisted continued attacks “cannot go unchalleng­ed” as she pledged to continue working with the UK’S “closest allies” on how the dictatorsh­ip is held to account.

It was also reported last night that Mrs May is ready to join military action against the Assad regime in Syria without first seeking parliament­ary consent. She is reportedly of the view that the need for a response is urgent.

Mrs May said: “All the indication­s are that the Syrian regime was responsibl­e and we will be working with our closest allies on how we can ensure that those who are responsibl­e are held to account and how we can prevent and deter the humanitari­an catastroph­e that comes from the use of chemical weapons in the future.

“The continued use of chemical weapons cannot go unchalleng­ed.”

Her remarks came after US President Donald Trump issued a stark threat yesterday that missiles “will be coming” in response to the Syrian government’s suspected chemical attack that killed at least 40 people.

In an early morning tweet, Trump wrote: “Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and ‘smart’! You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!” Syria’s Foreign

Ministry said that the US president’s threats are “reckless” and endanger internatio­nal peace and security.

Trump’s tweet also drew a quick response from Russia’s Foreign Ministry. Spokeswoma­n Maria Zakharova said on Facebook that “smart” missiles would destroy any evidence of a chemical weapons attack.

The Prime Minister sidesteppe­d questions over whether she was concerned about the US president’s tweet.

She told reporters during a visit to Birmingham that she was “appalled” but “not surprised” by Russia’s decision to veto a draft resolution at the United Nations on Tuesday which sought to create a new body to determine responsibi­lity for the attack.

“There can be no role now for investigat­ions by the United Nations,” Mrs May said.

She faces pressure to secure support from the Commons, which is currently in recess for Easter, for involving Britain in airstrikes but has the power to take the decision without the backing of MPS.

Last night the SNP said it would be a “scandal” if Theresa May does not seek parliament’s permission to launch bombing raids on Syria.

In a letter to the Prime Minister, SNP defence spokesman Stewart Mcdonald said MPS must have a say over any change to the role of UK forces in Syria.

Mr Mcdonald said chemical weapons attacks in Syria should be condemned in the “strongest terms” and action taken to ensure they don’t happen again.

In his letter the SNP defence spokesman said: “I am not convinced that the retaliator­y airstrikes being proposed by the United States is a proper way forward. Though should the UK government wish to participat­e then it must only do so if the UK parliament gives its consent.”

Yesterday US defence secretary Jim Mattis appeared to counter’s Trump’s warning by saying that evidence of what happened in Saturday’s suspected attack near Damascus is still being studied. “We’re still assessing the intelligen­ce, ourselves and our allies,” Mr Mattis said. “We’re still working on this.”

Asked whether the US military was ready to conduct an attack in Syria if ordered, Mattis replied: “We stand ready to provide military options if they’re appropriat­e, as the president determines.”

Mr Trump did not detail what a strike would look like, or whether these would be US missiles. US officials have been consulting with global allies, including the UK, on a possible joint military response to Syria’s alleged poison gas attack. Trump cancelled a foreign trip to South America in order to manage a crisis that is testing his vow to stand up to Syrian President Bashar al-assad.

The term “smart” missile dates to the introducti­on decades ago of weapons with advanced guidance systems – for example, using GPS – to achieve greater precision in targeting. The term was meant to contrast with “dumb” bombs lacking such technology. Virtually all US missiles now have advanced guidance systems.

Russian politician­s have warned the US that Moscow would view an airstrike on Syria as a war crime and that it could trigger a direct military clash between the two former Cold War adversarie­s. Russia’s ambassador to Lebanon said any missiles fired at Syria would be shot down and the launching sites targeted – a stark warning of a potential major confrontat­ion.

Shortly after warning that missiles were coming, Trump tweeted that the US “relationsh­ip with Russia is worse now than it has ever been, and that includes the Cold War.” Then, striking a more conciliato­ry tone, he said: “There is no reason for this. Russia needs us to help with their economy, something that would be very easy to do, and we need all nations to work together. Stop the arms race?”

Mr Trump’s administra­tion has sought to show toughness on Russia, with a series of economic and diplomatic actions, including new sanctions last week against government officials and oligarchs. The US leader has largely avoided criticisin­g Russian President Vladimir Putin by name, though he singled him out in a tweet over the weekend for supporting Assad.

In the past, Trump has condemned others for forecastin­g military plans, repeatedly attacking President Barack Obama during the 2016 election campaign.

During one speech, he said, “We must as a nation be more unpredicta­ble. We are totally predictabl­e. We tell everything. We’re sending troops. We tell them. We’re sending something else. We have a news conference. We have to be unpredicta­ble.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom