The Scotsman

‘ The truth is yet to come out’ on Lockerbie bomb

● Campaigner­s welcome review of Megrahi conviction 30 years on from atrocity

- BY CHRIS MARSHALL Home Affairs Correspond­ent

Campaigner­s for them an found guilty of carrying out the 1988 Locker-bie bombing have welcomed the “momentous” decision to review his conviction.

The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission ( SCCRC) has confirmed an applicatio­n from Abdelbaset Ali al- Megrahi’s family will be taken forward to decide whether it should be referred for an appeal. Megrahi, who died in 2012, was jailed in 2001 for the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 which killed 270 people.

The SCCRC said yesterday that i t believed Megrahi had abandoned an earlier appeal because he thought it would result in him being released from prison and allowed to return home to Libya. The former i ntelligenc­e officer was released from custody in 2009 with terminal prostate cancer and died in Tripoli three years later.

Gerard Sinclair, the chief executive of the SCCRC, said: “In any applicatio­n where an applicant has previously chosen to abandon an appeal against conviction the commission will, at the first stage of its process, look carefully at the reasons why the appeal was abandoned and consider whether it is in the interests of justice to allow a fur ther review of the conviction.

“The commission has now investigat­ed this particular matter and interviewe­d the key personnel who were involved in the process at the time the previous appeal was abandoned

in 2009. The commission has also sought access to the rele - vant materials and has recovered the vast majority of these, including the defence papers which were not provided during its previous review.

“Having considered all the available evidence, the commission believes that Mr Megrahi, in abandoning his appeal, did so as he held a genuine and reasonable belief that such a course of action would result in him being able to return home to Libya at a time when he was suffering from terminal cancer.”

He added: “On that basis, the commission has decided that it is in the interests of justice to accept the current applicatio­n for a full review of his conviction.”

A previous review of Megrahi’s conviction led to the case being referred to the High Court for an appeal in 2007 after the SCCRC determined there may have been a miscarriag­e of justice.

That appeal was abandoned with Megrahi’s release from prison on what the Scottish Government called compassion­ate grounds.

A further applicatio­n was made on Megrahi’s behalf by relatives of some of the vic- tims in 2014 but was rejected by j udges. One r el at ive s ai d l ast night t hat t he f ull t ruth about the bombing “has never come out”.

The l ate s t appli cat i on has been brought by members of Megrahi’s family, including his wife and son, and has allowed the SCCRC access to the original appeal documents.

In a statement released on behalf of the family yesterday, solicitor Aamer Anwar said: “To date both the UK government and Scottish Government have claimed that they played no role in pressuring Mr Meg ra hi into dropping his appeal as a condition of his immediate release. It was alleged that this was fundamenta­lly untrue.

“We welcome the news that today the SCCRC ,having considered all the available evidence, have confirmed that they believe that when Mr Megrahi abandoned his appeal, he did so as he believed he held a genuine and reasonable belief that such a course of action would result in him being able to return home.”

He added: “The reputation of the Scottish law has suffered both at home and internatio­nally because of widespread doubts about the conviction of Mr Megrahi. It is in the interests of justice and restoring confidence in our criminal justice system that these doubts can be addressed, however t he only place to determine whether a miscarriag­e of justice did occur is in the appeal court, where the evidence can be subjected to rigorous scrutiny.”

Police Scotland is currently examining allegation­s made by the Justice for Meg ra hi ( JFM) group about the prosecutio­n of Megrahi at Camp Zei stint he Netherland­s 18 years ago.

Now in its fifth year, Operation Sandwood is investigat­ing a number of complaints against prosecutor­s, police and forensic officials, alleging attempts to pervert the course of justice

Iain McKie, a member of JFM, said :“This is an absolutely momentous decision given the years of the system trying to bury the whole question of Locker bi ea nd Mr Megrahi’s guilt.

“The S CC R C, having reviewed the evidence, has accepted Mr Megrahi’s decision to give up his appeal was motivated by a dying man’s wish to return home.

“It seems to me the SCCRC have carried out a bold step in carrying out that work.

“This comes together nicely with the police about to report to the Crown Office on the possible criminalit­y in the people involved in the investigat­ion and trial.”

Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora died in the bombing, said the length of time taken to reach this point was “lamentable”.

He said: “[ In 2015] they decided the immediate relatives of the murder victims from the atrocity weren’ t allowed to question how the Scottish authoritie­s had handled the case.

“They’ re now confronted by the legally proven successors to Megrahi asking for an appeal. They will find it very difficult to deny the family.

“The only dark cloud is that the SCCRC have done three years work on it already. Hope- fully that will mean that they don’t take very long to look into the case again.”

Barrie Berk ley ,91, whose son Ali stair died aged 29 in the bombing, said: “The general view of members of our group is that the full truth has never come out and it was just convenient to take up a case against al- Megrahi.”

Last night, Kenny Macaskill, who was justice secretary at the time of Megrahi’s release, said it had been the Libyan’s own decision to abandon his earlier appeal.

He said: “The SCCRC are an important part of the Scottish justice system and their investigat­ions and procedures need to be respected.

“The decision to abandon his appeal was for Mr Megrahi and his advisers. Neither pressure was put up on him nor was the decision to release dependent on it.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 0 Lord Abernethy, Lord Coulsfield, Lord Sutherland and Lord Maclean in court at Camp Zeist
0 Lord Abernethy, Lord Coulsfield, Lord Sutherland and Lord Maclean in court at Camp Zeist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom