The Scotsman

Focusongro­wth

-

There is no doubt the Growth Commission report commission­ed by the SNP has provoked considerab­le debate, which is a core part of its purpose. It has attracted significan­t praise, including some from unlikely and not always welcome quarters such as right-wing commentato­rs.

It has also attracted criticism from some sectors of the independen­ce movement. However, to describe it as a “debacle” as Gerald Edwards did (Letters, 9 June) is an overstatem­ent. Indeed, while Unionists froth, the bulk of the SNP and wider independen­ce support are calm in the knowledge that the contents are some way off being declared as SNP policy and the membership will be involved in an extensive consultati­on exercise. It also seems logical and sensible to delay detailed discussion until that process is completed.

Gerald Edwards regularly writes to predict apocalypse for the SNP. It never happens. His latest dire prediction that “the hawks are circling” for Nicola Sturgeon will go the same way, accompanie­d by the sound of him whistling in the dark.

GILL TURNER Derby Street, Edinburgh

Does Channel 4 realise what they have done? In questionin­g the SNP leader on the costs of independen­ce, the interviewe­r, Ciaran Jenkins, did not accept assertions and bluffs as answers. At the fifth attempt a simple and surely embarrasse­d “I don’t know’’ was elicited (your report, 9 June.)

It means, of course, that

Channel 4 have now joined the BBC in the SNP’S bad books. Their Glasgow offices can prepare themselves for a “spontaneou­s’’ march. How dare they push the SNP for an answer to perhaps the most telling question of all? Everyone is out to get them, will be the retort.

ALEXANDER MCKAY New Cut Rigg, Edinburgh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom