BBC and Sir Cliff

Commentators argue that to “protect a free media and public’s right to know” the judgment in favour of Sir Cliff Richard “cannot – and must not – be allowed to stand”. However, the facts of this case suggest the judgment of Mr Justice Mann was absolutely correct.

Sir Cliff hadn’t been questioned, let alone charged, when the BBC aired its grossly sensationalist coverage. It didn’t give him sufficient time before the broadcast to respond and emails were produced showing it strongarmed the police into giving their co-operation.

The BBC’S reputation as a leader of the “free media” took a hit when the judge highlighted the lack of “honesty and reliability” shown by witnesses, singling out several for criticism. It also compounded the outrage by entering the piece for an RTS award.

This is but a step from the vile US “Perp Walk”, where humiliated defendants are denied the presumption of innocence.

In addition, there are too many instances of supposed rapists being shamed by anonymous accusers who turn out to be vindictive fantasists.

(REV DR) JOHN CAMERON

Howard Place, St Andrews

Regarding the decision of the courts about national icon Sir Cliff Richard, might I suggest that as a committed Christian he forgives, rather than prosecutes, the BBC?

SHONA PHILIP Raeburn Street, Edinburgh

Who is to pay for the challenge, the BBC’S appeal? Us – the licence payer!

JAMES WATSON Randolph Crescent, Dunbar