Washington scrambles to unmask anonymous ‘resistance’ author
● Trump said to be furious about New York Times opinion piece
An opinion piece in The New York Times by an anonymous senior administration official claiming to be part of a “resistance” working “from within” to thwart President Donald Trump’s “worst inclinations” set off a wild guessing game inside and outside the White House on the author’s identity.
Swift denials of involvement in the op-ed came yesterday from top administration officials, including the office of Vice-president Mike Pence, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
Trump himself was furious, tweeting: “The Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake News Media, are going Crazy - & they don’t know what to do.”
On Wednesday night, Trump tweeted a demand that if “the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called on the “coward” who wrote the piece to “do the right thing and resign”.
White House officials did not respond to a request to elaborate on Trump’s call for the writer to be turned over to the government or the unsupported national security ground of his demand.
To some, the ultimatum appeared to play into the very concerns about the president’s impulses raised by the essay’s author. Trump has demanded that aides identify the leaker, though it was not yet clear how they might go about doing so.
In a House of Cards-style plot twist in an already over-the-top administration, Trump allies and political insiders scrambled to unmask the writer.
The author, claiming to be part of the “resistance” to
Trump “working diligently from within” his administration, said: “Many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.”
“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room,” the author continued. “We fully recognise what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even
when Donald Trump won’t.” Trump raged about the piece in the White House, calling around to confidants to vent about the disloyalty of the author and fuming that the so-called “Deep State” within the federal government had conspired against him.
The text of the op-ed was pulled apart for clues: The writer is identified as an “administration official”; does that mean a person who works outside the White House? The references to Russia and the late Senator John Mccain – do they suggest someone working in national security? Does the writing style sound like someone who worked at a think tank? In a tweet, the Times used the pronoun “he” to refer to the writer; does that rule out all women?
The newspaper later said the tweet referring to “he” had been “drafted by someone who is not aware of the author’s identity, including the gender, so the use of ‘he’ was an error”.
The guessing game seeped into the White House, as current and former staffers traded calls and texts trying to figure out who could have written the piece, some turning to reporters and asking them for clues. Some of the most senior members of the administration were forced to deny they were the author.
Hotly debated on Twitter was the author’s use of the word “lodestar,” which pops up frequently in speeches by the vice-president. In a rare step, Mr Pence’s communications director Jarrod Agen tweeted: “The Vice-president puts his name on his Op-eds.”