The Scotsman

Chelsea fan banned for life over Sterling racial abuse

● Club also temporaril­y excludes five other supporters for between one and two years

- By COLIN STEWART

Chelsea have permanentl­y banned one supporter from Stamford Bridge for the use of racially abusive language and threatenin­g and aggressive behaviour during last season’s home game with Manchester City.

The Premier League club have also temporaril­y excluded five other fans for periods of between one and two years for the use of abusive language and threatenin­g and aggressive behaviour at the fixture on 8 December.

Claims City forward Raheem Sterling was racially abused by a member of the crowd during the Blues’ 2-0 win were investigat­ed by police but the Crown Prosecutio­n Service ruled there was insufficie­nt evidence to proceed.

Chelsea said they had delayed reaching a decision in the cases in order to ensure they did not prejudice that investigat­ion.

The club concluded, with the use of video evidence, interviews with potential witnesses, and advice from lip-reading experts, that racially abusive words had been used by the fan handed a lifetime ban.

Referring to that supporter, a club statement read: “While the club respects the decision of the CPS [not to charge the individual with a criminal offence], the question that it had to determine was not whether a criminal offence had been committed, but rather whether the individual acted in breach of the ticketing terms and conditions. In this regard, the club operates to the civil standard of proof, which is entirely different to the criminal standard.

“In reaching its decision, the club took into account the denial made by the individual as well as a range of other evidence, including video evidence and evidence from two lip-reading experts – both of whom advised that the individual had used words that are racially abusive.”

The five fans handed temporary bans from the stadium will be allowed to return subject to “undertakin­gs about their future behaviour”.

Thestateme­ntcontinue­d:“in this case the behaviour of all six individual­s crossed the line of what is acceptable. Furthermor­e, in the case of the supporter who was found by the club to have used racially abusive language, there is no place for this behaviour at Stamford Bridge and a permanent exclusion was the appropriat­e sanction.”

Anti-discrimina­tion campaigner­s Kick It Out expressed frustratio­n with the CPS decision but praised Chelsea for sending a “strong message” against racism.

A statement read: “We are disappoint­ed that the Crown Prosecutio­n Service decided not to pursue a case against the supporter who racially abused Raheem Sterling, but we are pleased Chelsea have sent a strong message that racism has absolutely no place at their club or in football.”

 ??  ?? 0 Manchester City’s Raheem Sterling, left, in action during the 8 December game at Stamford Bridge where he was racially abused.
0 Manchester City’s Raheem Sterling, left, in action during the 8 December game at Stamford Bridge where he was racially abused.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom