The Scotsman

Critics backed by Priestley report as SQA continues to deny obvious

- Analysis Conor Matchett

The release of the Priestley report is proof, if it was needed, that the exam results fiasco this summer was not only avoidable, but should have been anticipate­d.

John Swinney is lucky to be still standing as education secretary. He survived calls to quit at the height of the scandal and on any other day, cancelling National 5 exams would have been front page.

It’s a choice that will please nobody. Teachers will say it adds to their workload, pupils will be guinea pigs if sitting exams or not, while politician­s argue over specifics.

That debate on the appropriat­eness of exams will

rage on, but as it does the utter failure of the 2020 exam results flies under the radar.

A cynic would suggest the delay to Mr Swinney’s statement by a day was deliberate. New restrictio­ns, Nicola Sturgeon’s evidence to the Salmond inquiry and a debate on the Internal Market Bill meant Wednesday was a good day to bury bad news.

The failure of both the qualificat­ions authority and, in John Swinney one of the most experience­d Scottish Government ministers, to spot the inevitable consequenc­es of using such a model is most shocking and the Priestley report is damning. Issues around the algo

rithm impacting the poorest should have been “anticipate­d”, the defence the attainment gap had narrowed was

“over- focused” on by the government, while the model itself was “arbitrary”.

Now with the revelation­s a third of all students saw their grades lowered by one grade and an astonishin­g 408 individual­s saw five or more grades downgraded under the original system the question must be asked why warning signs were brazenly ignored.

Instead of dealing with the issue, Mr Swinney’s office were told to “do lots of digging” to spin the positives, seemingly blind to the obvious and ignorant of the impact on individual­s.

Clearly the moderation system was unfit for purpose. Somehow the SQA still sits with its fingers in its ears, insisting in the report that they held “no regret” in using the scandal- hit algorithm.

 ??  ?? 0 John Swinney was criticised in the Priestley report
0 John Swinney was criticised in the Priestley report

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom