The Scotsman

Beauty still trumps brains in too many workplaces

‘Lookism’ – the judging of an employee’s performanc­e based on physical appearance – is not illegal, but arguably it should be, write Christophe­r Warhurst and Dennis Nickson

-

Universiti­es position themselves as places where brains matter. It seems strange then that students at a US university would rate attractive academics to be better teachers.

This was the finding of a recent paper from the University of Memphis, which concluded that female academics suffered most from this.

It raises an uncomforta­ble propositio­n, that beauty trumps brains even in 21st century workplaces. It would certainly be supported by veteran female broadcaste­rs such as radio presenter Libby Purves, who recently complained about the way the BBC dispenses with women of a certain age.

Another survey, this time in the UK, gave a deeper sense of the problem. It reported that employers were asking female employees to dress “sexier” and wear make-up during video meetings.

Published by law firm Slater and Gordon over the summer, and based on a poll of 2,000 office-based staff working from home during lockdown, the report found that 35 per cent of women had experience­d at least one sexist demand from their employer, usually relating to how they dressed for video meetings. Women also reported being asked to wear more makeup, do something to their hair or dress more provocativ­ely. Reasons offered by their bosses were that it would “help win business” and be “pleasing to a client”.

It seems as though the shift to more virtual working has not eradicated what Danielle Parsons, an employment lawyer at Slater and Gordon, described as “archaic behaviour” which “has no place in the modern working world”. When employees’ performanc­e is judged on the basis of their physical appearance, potentiall­y shaping their pay and prospects in work, it is known as lookism. It is not illegal, but arguably it should be.

The Slater and Gordon survey findings affirm that many trends that we describe in our recent book, Aesthetic Labour, are widespread and continuing despite remote working. Our book reports over 20 years of research and thinking about this problem. Although our research started by focusing on frontline work in hospitalit­y and retail, the same issue has expanded into a diverse range of roles including academics, traffic wardens, recruitmen­t consultant­s, interprete­rs, TV news anchors and circus acrobats.

Companies think that paying greater attention to employees’ appearance will make them more competitiv­e, while public sector organisati­ons think it will make them more liked. As a result, they are all becoming ever more prescripti­ve in telling employees how they should look, dress and talk.

It happens both to men and women, though more often to women, and is often tied in more broadly with sexualisin­g them at work. For example, while Slater and Gordon found that one-third of men and women had “put up with” comments about their appearance during video calls, women were much likelier to face degrading requests to appear sexier.

When we analysed ten years of employees’ complaints about lookism to the Equal Opportunit­ies Commission in Australia, we found that the proportion from men was rising across sectors but that twothirds of complaints were still from women. Interestin­gly, the University of Memphis study found no correlatio­n for male academics between how their looks were perceived and how their performanc­e

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom