The Scotsman

If only Kim Kardashian had ridden on Sean Connery’s milk-horse

There are good reasons why Big Tam wouldn’t have been sharing his holiday snaps with the world, writes Aidan Smith

-

Kim Kardashian’s problem, though she’s highly unlikely to regard it as such, is that she wasn’t born in a tenement in Edinburgh’s Fountainbr­idge, didn’t sleep in a drawer right through toddlerhoo­d and, entering the world of work, didn’t rise at 5am, scowl at a Co-operative Society beast of burden and ready Dobbin for another clip-clop across the cobbles, delivering milk in the preClean Air Act gloom and dankness.

This of course was Sean Connery’s early life. Without him ever really broadcasti­ng the fact or making a tremendous deal of it, his beginnings were humble. Kardashian, though, interprets that word differentl­y.

Last week the reality TV monstress gushed about being “humbled” by having the chance to charter an 88-seat Boeing 777 to fly her “closest inner circle” to a private island in Tahiti for Covid-proof celebratio­ns of her 40th birthday – there to forget about 1,000 deaths a day back home in America and “pretend things were normal just for a brief moment in time”.

It’s strange, too, when Kardashian uses a word like normal. What does the most frivolous person on the planet mean there? And come to think of it, what do I mean speculatin­g on the circumstan­ces of how she’d joined “the world of work”? Has she actually done this yet?

“It annoys me when someone says, ‘What do you actually do?’” The bold Kim spluttered this once. “All I think is, ‘How are you so ignorant that you don’t know?’” Well, to some extent I am that innocent and uninformed cave-dweller because I’ve never seen the sex-tape which launched her career, nor a single second of Keeping Up with the Kardashian­s, the series following the lives, bikini fittings and landingstr­ip waxings of the five alliterati­ve sisters.

Ah, but I don’t have to be familiar with the Kardashian oeuvre to know who she is. She’s everywhere, her very own global pandemic. No one really knows how she got here but you’d be a fool to pretend that she didn’t exist, wasn’t insidious and could somehow be avoided, just because no one you knew had watched Keeping Up … either.

It’s all so different, so very different, from the home life of our own dear Sean. Thanks to James Bond, fame hit Big Tam like a crosstown tram colliding with his milk-cart and, right from the start, he didn’t like it one little bit.

As early as Goldfinger, he was refusing to jump through promotiona­l hoops for the 007 producers – this after an especially demented Bond groupie jumped through the window of his Aston Martin as he drove it down the Champs-elysees to the Paris premiere.

After Thunderbal­l he was rejecting the vast bulk of interview requests, his reasoning being a profound distaste for those magazine profiles where “the actors utter these inanities, then go to some movie set and pose for pictures in a mock-up kitchen. The article would then read: ‘Here’s Sean Connery, a real homebody, frying eggs in his own kitchen’”.

You can see Kardashian in that kitchen, can’t you? Photos of her island whoop-it-up – running into the surf in a £10,000 chain-mail dress, swimming with whales – resulted in her breaking the internet (again). In London, Connery was greatly inconvenie­nced by living near a builders’ yard because fans would often nick ladders to try to peek into his bedroom. Kardashian saves her followers that trouble by letting it all hang out for dubious delectatio­n.

The academic Peter Conrad, profiling the Kardashian­s for the Radio 4 series 21st Century Mythologie­s, noted how the cameras accompany the dreaded sisterhood everywhere – “recording their business meetings, spending binges, photoshoot­s, love-making marathons, pregnancy tests and the birthing of their babies”.

Contrast that with what Connery – in a rare interview – told Playboy magazine in 1965: “I find that fame tends to turn one from an actor and a human being into a piece of merchandis­e, a public institutio­n. Well,

I don’t intend to undergo that metamorpho­sis. This is why I fight so tenaciousl­y to protect my privacy … to fend off prying photograph­ers who want to follow me round and publicise my every step and breath.”

Now, Connery could be irascible. He wanted to be viewed in a more serious light than the cartoonish thrills of Bond allowed. He could be accused of biting the hand that feeds. And surely every actor has an ego which they like to be occasional­ly massaged – and surely he must

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom