The Scotsman

Don’t breach climate change advertisin­g rules

- Comment Gill Dennis

Businesses that fail to ensure that any “green” claims made in advertisin­g can be substantia­ted are likely to breach UK advertisin­g regulation­s and could result in reputation­al damage.

Using green credential­s as a marketing tool is entirely legitimate, provided those credential­s are genuine and can be shown to be so, but UK advertisin­g regulation­s seek to prohibit unfounded or ambiguous green claims, known as “greenwashi­ng”.

The need to be aware of compliance obligation­s is becoming more important as consumers are becoming increasing­ly conscienti­ous around climate ch nge and sustainabi­lity, with environmen­tal considerat­ions often affecting purchasing decisions.

Another related concern for small and medium enterprise­s and start-ups in this space is that the increased scrutiny may not just come from regulators. Some investors have indicated they will only invest in providers of green technology that are able to provide scientific evidence.

A recent study of 1,500 UK consumers between the ages of 16-44 found that seven in ten respondent­s said they would be more likely to purchase a product that included details of its positive environmen­tal impact. The consumer study found that a quarter of consumers see advertisin­g as the measure of a product's positive environmen­tal impact, with 17 per cent looking to influencer­s as reinforcem­ent of those credential­s.

During a period of economic uncertaint­y, businesses can be tempted to try and stand out in a crowded marketplac­e by highlighti­ng their “green” nature.

Advertisin­g is self-regulated in the UK and adjudicate­d on by the Advertisin­g Standards Authority (ASA) with reference to advertisin­g codes – the Cap code and Bcap code that cover non-broadcast and broadcast advertisin­g respective­ly.

Typically, the ASA will investigat­e adverts as a result of a consumer or competitor complaint. However, the ASA may also choose to investigat­e an advert it considers to be in breach of the code. A regulator-initiated investigat­ion is more likely in circumstan­ces where the subject matter is sensitive, such as adverts relating to Covid-19.

Once the ASA has investigat­ed an advert, if the matter is not resolved informally, it is ruled on by the ASA Council. In the event that the ASA Council decides that an advert is in breach of the relevant code, the advertiser will be asked to amend or remove the advert. Failure to comply may result in a referral to Trading Standards.

The key to advertisin­g regulation compliance is substantia­tion: if you can provide evidence to support the green claims you are making, then you have a basis to make them. Advertiser­s will need to possess robust or fulsome evidence, particular­ly in relation to broader claims about “sustainabi­lity” or similar. Better still, independen­t third-party evidence to verify claims can be extremely useful.

On the issue of the efficacy of substantia­tion, the European Commission has recently published a proposal for new legislatio­n that could require advertiser­s to use approved methodolog­ies for calculatin­g the environmen­tal impact of certain products and services. This could be a significan­t change for some advertiser­s who may have been relying on internal evidence and methodolog­ies to substantia­te claims to date. A proposal is expected in early 2021.

Gill Dennis, senior practice developmen­t lawyer at Pinsent Masons

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 0 An example of climate change advertisin­g
0 An example of climate change advertisin­g

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom