The Scotsman

Resign yourself to dealing with a range of issues

A resignatio­n does not have to be accepted before it is valid, writes Jack Boyle

- Jack Boyle is Director, Employment Law, Blackadder­s LLP

During the last 12 months there has been significan­t public interest around resignatio­ns that have either materialis­ed, or not materialis­ed in circumstan­ces where a resignatio­n has been called for: Dominic Cummings; Margaret Ferrier; Boris Johnson (based on some opinion polls); Neil Lennon.

Resignatio­ns are regularly encountere­din the world of employment, and indeed employment tribunals. Some people resign to start a new job, othersbeca­use they hate their existing job (or boss). Some resign to fall on their sword and avoid an inevitable sac king. And some resign when they feel they have no alternativ­e. Some people even resign when they don’t mean to.

There is no magic formula required for a resignatio­n. Generally, there will be a notice period required by the employment contract. Whilst ideally it is best for a resignatio­n to be committed to writing, this is not a legal requiremen­t. Plenty of resignatio­ns are tendered verbally. Of course, employers prefer to have resignatio­ns in writing for the sake of a solid paper trail.

A resignatio­n does not have to be accepted before it is valid. It is not an invitation to dinner. It is one party telling the other “I no longer want to work for you”. Occasional­ly we encounter employer clients who, when faced with a resignatio­n, think they can reject it or refuse to accept it. That is misplaced. Of course, good practice is to acknowledg­e a resignatio­n.

Are there any circumstan­ces when an employer cannot “accept” a resignatio­n?generally speaking, where the employer receives a clear, unambigu

o us statement from the employee communicat­ing resignatio­n, the employer is safe to “accept” it. However, where the words spoken are ambiguous, or where the surroundin­g circumstan­ces would cast doubt as to whether the employee actually meant to re sign, the employer should think twice.

These circumstan­ces are often referred to as ‘heat of the moment’ or ‘special circumstan­ces’ resignatio­ns. For example, an employee may have an argument with their boss which results in the employee storming off and uttering words to the effect of“shove your job up your….”.

These cases sometimes involve profanelan­guage. that would be a‘ heat of the moment’ resignatio­n. The words were spoken by the employee mid argument. the words were ambiguous (there is no mention of resignatio­n).

In such situations, the correct approach is for the employer to allow the employee a cooling-off period and an opportunit­y to reconsider whether the employee actually intended to resign. A failure to do so, and proceeding instead to issue the P45, is a risky approach for an employer. There is a risk that an employment tribunal would find such an employee not to have resigned, but rather to have been dismissed. The knock-on effect is that such a dismissal would potentiall­y be an unfair dismissal, entitling the employee to compensati­on (assuming they had been employed for at least two years).

If you have resigned in a bust-up situation and want to change your mind, act quickly and alert your employer. an apology is useful too if you have overreacte­d. employers should likewise think twice before reaching for the P45.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom