The Scotsman

Supreme court Uber ruling ‘will affect wider gig economy’

- By BRIAN FARMER bfarmer@scotsman.com

Union bosses say a Supreme Court ruling that Uber drivers should be classed as workers will have “enormous implicatio­ns” and affect people throughout the gig economy.

Supreme Court justices ruled on the latest round of a long-running fight between Uber operating companies and drivers on Friday.

Uber operating companies, who said drivers were contractor­s not workers, appealed to the Supreme Court after losing three earlier rounds of the fight.

But judges unanimousl­y dismissed Uber's appeal.

Lawyers say the ruling means Uber drivers will be entitled to workers' rights, such as holiday pay.

A law firm, Leigh Day, enlisted by the GMB union to represent Uber drivers says drivers will be entitled to compensati­on for lost pay.

But union officials said the ruling had ramificati­ons beyond Uber.

Scottish TUC general secretary Roz Foyer said :“This ruling has enormous implicatio­ns for employment law which go beyond Uber to the wider gig economy.”

The associatio­n of independen­t Profession­als and the Self employed said there was a “glaring need for clarity” – and urged the government to introduce a statutory definition of self-employment.

“The very fact this case has come to the UK'S Supreme Court shows the UK'S employment law is not working,” said the associatio­n' s director of policy, Andy Chamberlai­n.

“There is a glaring need for clarity in this area, to clear the confusion in the gig economy.”

He added: “The gig economy is enormously complex, including many people who are legitimate­ly self-employed and many others who really, based on their working circumstan­ces, should be classed as workers.

“It is a patchwork of grey areas between employment and self-employment: the only way to resolve this tangle is to clarify employment status in UK law.” a GMB spokesman said officials would now consult with Uber driver members over forthcomin­g compensati­on claims.

Mick rix, gmb national officer, said :“This has been a gruelling four-year legal battle for our members but it's ended in a historic win. The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of three previous courts, backing up what GMB has said all along: Uber drivers are workers and entitled to breaks, holiday pay and minimum wage.

"Uber must now stop wasting time and money pursuing lost legal causes and do what's right by the drivers who prop up its empire .” lawyers uber operating companies told Supreme Court justices that drivers did not “undertake to work” for Uber but were “independen­t, third party contractor­s”.

But justices unanimousl­y ruled against Uber.

“It can be seen that the transporta­tion service performed by drivers and offered to passengers through the Uber app is very tightly defined and controlled by uber,” said one justice, Lord Leggatt, in Friday's ruling.

"The employment tribunal was, in my view, entitled to conclude that, by logging onto the U be rap pin london, a claimant driver came within the definition of a ‘worker’.”

 ??  ?? Driver Yaseen Aslam outside the Supreme Court where justices ruled against Uber
Driver Yaseen Aslam outside the Supreme Court where justices ruled against Uber

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom