The Scotsman

Lobbying rules ‘insufficie­nt’ in light of Cameron’s efforts

- By PATRICK DALY newsdesk@scotsman.com

Lobbying rules were "insufficie­nt" in the face of David Cameron's bidding on behalf of failed finance firm Greensill Capital, and should be strengthen­ed, MPS have said.

The former Conservati­ve prime minister placed calls and sent dozens of texts and emails to ministers and senior officials as he tried to win access to Covid support programmes for the since-collapsed specialist bank.

However, as there were more than two years between his resignatio­n from Downing Street and taking up his role at Greensill, Mr Cameron's actionshav­ebeendeeme­dpermissib­le under current rules.

But the Commons Treasury Committee, which carried out one of nine investigat­ions into the Greensill saga, said the rules should be tightened to prevent further lobbying episodes from occurring.

"We accept that Mr Cameron did not break the rules governing lobbying by former ministers, but that reflects on the insufficie­nt strength of the rules, and there is a strong case for strengthen­ing them," said the committee's Lessons from Greensill Capital report.

In what will be awkward reading for Mr Cameron, the committee called into question his judgment in relation to his lobbying on behalf of Greensill, in which he held shares, and said the Treasury was right to reject the firm's offer.

They said that, had he "taken a broader and more enquiring assessment of the business", there were "signals available" which might have led him to take a "more restrained approach" .

MPS were also critical of the Treasury for failing to direct him into "more formal methods of communicat­ion" after his initial contact with officials.

In the 71-page report, the cross-party group of politician­s said they expected the department "to put in place more formal processes to deal with any such lobbying attempts by ex-prime ministers or ministers in the future".

The committee expressed surprise at the Treasury's "firm conviction" that Mr Cameron did not benefit from special treatment as a result of his status as former prime minister.

"We are very surprised about this, given that Mr Cameron was an ex-prime minister, who had worked with those he was lobbying.”

 ??  ?? The committee report called into question David Cameron’s judgment
The committee report called into question David Cameron’s judgment

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom