The Scotsman

The missing Employment Bill is a big omission

- Betsy Williamson

The recent Queen’s Speech, historic in its own right with the absence of Her Majesty at the State Opening of Parliament for the first time in 59 years, contained 38 new laws, but absent was the long-promised Employment Bill.

First mooted in 2019 and to be introduced when parliament­ary time allowed, Prime Minister Boris Johnson decided this was not the time to be bothering his government with trifling matters such as improving the working person’s lot.

Time instead was devoted to targeting so-called disruptive eco-warriors in a public order bill, forcing through the privatisat­ion of Channel 4, a “levelling up” bill which promises people can have “more of a say over changing street names” and an animal welfare bill to introduce new ways to tackle pet abduction and puppy smuggling.

The shelved bill was to include a number of measures strengthen­ing workers’ rights. Despite being mooted pre-pandemic, some of the issues to be addressed have become more relevant than ever.

This included a proposal to establish a single state body which would be responsibl­e for enforcing minimum wage requiremen­ts – something which may have helped ease the worries of those most affected by the cost-ofliving crisis.

Another casualty was measures to ensure employers pass on tips to staff in a transparen­t manner without deductions, while also a goner was the proposed right of those who work variable hours to be able to secure a stable contract after working for 26 weeks.

This government’s optics towards flexible working are further solidifyin­g. It still requires 26 weeks service before a request needs to be considered by an employer, rather than the proposed default of this being a right from day one of employment starting.

And workplace pregnancy discrimina­tion

was not tackled, with plans to extend redundancy protection for expectant mothers suffering the same fate as proposals for the right to a week’s leave for unpaid carers and paid leave for parents with children needing neonatal care.

It now falls to responsibl­e and savvy employers to consider what measures they can put in place to ensure they retain staff and make their organisati­ons more attractive against a backdrop of a skills shortage and increased employee mobility.

It is not purely altruism. In the current labour market, businesses need to ensure staff are properly looked after and feel valued for their contributi­on to the company or they will vote with their feet and take their leave.

Morally, there is an obligation on employers to go one better than the government by ensuring society’s most vulnerable groups are not unfairly disadvanta­ged.

Flexible or hybrid working is here to stay and no matter its absence from the statute book, employers who fail to get to grips with this mainstream requiremen­t – are putting themselves at a competitiv­e disadvanta­ge in recruiting the best available talent.

And improving protection for staff on maternity leave and other rights of leave separates the enlightene­d employer from the pack.

The Employment Bill is on the backburner but these changes are coming and smart employers can get ahead of the game by taking a positive attitude to supporting staff.

Betsy Williamson is the founder and MD of Core-asset Consulting

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? 0 Greater flexibilit­y can benefit people
0 Greater flexibilit­y can benefit people

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom