The Scotsman

We can no longer fail to count the cost of greenhouse gases

◆ Port Talbot is a sign the consequenc­es of burning fossil fuels have caught up with us, writes Anthony Seaton

- Anthony Seaton is a retired chest physician and professor of environmen­tal medicine

Driving west from Cardiff, you pass along the southern limit of the ice that once covered all of Scotland and most of England and which finally melted some 12,000 years ago, allowing the repopulati­on of our islands by Homo sapiens. The land revealed contained rich deposits of coal and iron ore which humans were to exploit over the succeeding millennia, initially learning to burn coal for heat and eventually to smelt iron ore, introducin­g the Iron Age about 800 BCE.

Coal, iron ore and lime to remove impurities were smelted to produce metallic iron which could simply be hammered into shape, as it was in the water mills on the Almond River in north Edinburgh, or melted and cast. Combined with carbon from charcoal, it made the stronger and more flexible steel.

In the early 18th century, this process was improved by using coke made by baking coal. Industrial­ist Andrew Carnegie saw to it that steel was to become essential to human developmen­t, as exemplifie­d by the Forth Bridge near his birthplace.

As you approach Swansea on your drive, you see between you and the bay ahead, a massive, smoky and fiery aggregatio­n of buildings and blast furnaces.

To your right, the hillside is bare, the vegetation killed by the fumes from the Port Talbot steelworks, a major contributo­r to both pollution and climate change, but also an enterprise that employs a good proportion of the people in the town.

Few families there will be unaffected by the planned changes to the steel plant, some of whom may already have previously been affected by the closure of the coal mines in the valleys to the north. The human suffering from such closures is familiar to many across Britain in places that once prospered from heavy industry. The suffering is unevenly distribute­d, affecting the poorest the most. It is one of the unaccounte­d-for costs of capitalism.

There is now a much less polluting way of making steel, by melting scrap, of which there is an abundance, steel being eminently recyclable. This uses an electric arc but requires no coal or coke and far fewer workers. Ideally, as in Scandinavi­a, green electricit­y should be used and in Port Talbot there is a missed opportunit­y – the Severn Estuary has the highest tides in Britain.

There was a time when there appeared to be an almost unending supply of cheap energy from coal, oil and gas. Then, just after the Second World War, we started to worry about the effects of air pollution, notably on the lung and heart. We noted that these afflicted poorer people more than the rich.

In 1989, I was asked to chair a UK Government committee on air quality standards. Over a decade, we advised successive government­s on protective standards for all the major pollutants as part of a national drive to improve air quality in our towns and cities.

The fall in the concentrat­ions of particles, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and carcinogen­s in UK urban air has been gratifying since then, largely from action on sources such as vehicles but unnoticed by those who do not remember the winter smogs of the 1950s.

Two pollutants, however, we ignored – carbon dioxide, since it had no immediate effect on health, and methane which seemed to occur in trivial concentrat­ions in urban air. By 2000, when our air quality recommenda­tions had passed into UK and EU law, I had become increasing­ly concerned about global temperatur­e rises and was lecturing to medical students on climate change as part of my teaching on environmen­t and health.

In 2006, I read Al Gore’s book, An Inconvenie­nt Truth, and had a conversati­on with him at the Edinburgh Internatio­nal Book Festival in which he encouraged me to help spread the word.

As an undergradu­ate, he had studied under a leading scientist in this field, Roger Revelle, and having retired as US Vice-president was going back to his scientific roots, educating the public on the subject. Since then, I have done my best to do the same.

Al Gore’s book had a subtitle – “the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it”. This returns me to Port Talbot, the planned 2,800 job losses at the steelworks, and what it means to all of us. It is an example of what happens when the real cost of an enterprise is shown to include its damage to our environmen­t and to us.

The carbon dioxide, particles and carcinogen­s generated over decades from the combustion of coal in the furnaces and coke ovens have cost human, animal and plant lives and health and we, the beneficiar­ies of the steel produced, have never considered this cost.

Some of this accumulate­d cost falls on the poor individual­s to be made redundant, but most of it makes its contributi­on to the mounting cost of halting the remorseles­s effects of rising air and sea temperatur­es.

Like most of the goods and harms of life on earth, these costs are distribute­d unevenly. The two main greenhouse gases produced by mankind, carbon dioxide and methane, are derived mainly from the combustion of fossil fuels, by drilling and mining, by agricultur­e and from landfill sites. Half of these gases are produced by the wealthiest one per cent of the world’s population, comprising those who earn more than £80,000 annually.

The costs are borne by all those whose homes and land, whose way of living, are destroyed by heat, floods and storms, usually the world’s poorest.

That is what Port Talbot means to all of us. Ask not for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee (and me).

 ?? PICTURE: GETTY ?? Plans to decarbonis­e the Port Talbot steelworks will see some 2,800 job losses
PICTURE: GETTY Plans to decarbonis­e the Port Talbot steelworks will see some 2,800 job losses
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom