The Scotsman

On the record

-

Many years ago my insurer advised me to keep a record of all telephone conversati­ons in case I got sued. I obliged and two things happened. Firstly, productivi­ty fell by 50 per cent because a one-hour conversati­on took a further hour to transcribe. Secondly, clients no longer phoned me, fearful of subsequent­ly being held liable for any inadverten­t comments made.

I mention this in relation to accusation­s being made about the recording of informatio­n by Scottish Ministers during the Covid Inquiry. The Inquiry heard that telephone conversati­ons fall under “recordable informatio­n” yet no witness has yet produced a fully transcribe­d telephone conversati­on. For the reasons outlined above, I’m not surprised.

One Tory MSP then claimed that in business terms it was “inconceiva­ble” having no minutes for the Scottish Government’s “Gold Command” meetings.

But in 40 years of working in procuremen­t I cannot recall a formal minute being issued when senior management were discussing strategy and decisions relating to bids for multi-million pound contracts. On building contracts informal meetings take place all the time, with key decisions made without a formal minute being issued. Nothing would get built otherwise. Personally, I always issue an email with bullet points the same day to protect myself. Failure to respond means you’ve accepted my record.

Those who know me will be aware that I write copious notes. On a number of occasions I’ve issued these as my record of events in the absence of a formal minute. As a direct consequenc­e of this, three attempts to sue me had to be abandoned because my pursuers admitted to not having read my draft minute which invited them to raise any concerns. It’s knowing what to record when, that’s the key.

Robert Menzies

Falkirk

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom