After 12 years ‘vital’ station is still on buffers
It is a green transport project in one of Scotland’s fastestgrowing communities that all involved said they support–and at a time when ministers have pledged to radically cut car use.
But 12 years after it was approved in principle, progress on opening a railway station at Winchburgh on the main Edinburgh-glasgow line appears to be glacial, if not at an impasse.
The West Lothian village has already doubled in size, with around 1,000 new homes, with up to 2,000 more planned over the next 20 years.
That will provide a significant potential source of rail passengers against a backdrop of the Scottish Government’s ambitious target of reducing road traffic by 20 percent within six years to meet its emissions goals.
On the face of it, everyone’s singing from the same hymn sheet over the station – but it sounds like they’re still not in unison.
On the one hand, the developer spearheading Winchburgh’s expansion is champing at the bit to get going on the station, West Lothian Council has expressed “huge concern” at the delays and the scottish government agreed that everyone must work together“to ensure it can happen ”, with its transport Scotland agency “committed to playing a full part”.
However, while Transport Scotland insisted the station must be “developer-led”,
Winchburgh Developments Lim it ed(wdl) said it still hadn’ t been given full details of infrastructure owner Network Rail’s assessment of the scheme to be able to submit detailed proposals. This is a requirement of the outline planning permission granted in 2012.
The developer also dismissed doubts about how much it was willing to contribute–it already spent £50 million on a new access junction on the M9 and other transport improvements –saying it can’ t commit until the final designs are produced so the cost of the station is known.
The council said it believed the estimated cost was “significantly higher” than original estimates. This comes just as ministers are scaling back on building projects because of a cut in capital funding from the UK government. It is expected to cost morethanthe£15m for Scotland’s newest station, which opened at East Lin ton in east lothian in December.
The situation has been complicated by Winchburgh being in newly-appointed transport secretary Fi on aHyslop’ s constituency, so oversight has been transferred to active travel minister Patrick Harvie.
Prior to becoming the( junior) transport minister last year, she had campaigned for the station and sought to accelerate the work by bringing the key bodies involved together.
However, the smoke and mirrors over what’s really going is reflected in apparent delays to a key meeting that could inject new impetus to the project.
Mr har vie has agreed to attend a meeting withwdl, transport Scotland, Network Rail and West Lothian Council. Transport Scotland initially told The Scotsman it was for the council to convene the meeting and “no proposed date has been received”.
The council said it had requested suitable dates from Mr Harvie’s office, and after“repeated reminders” it was told on February 12 the minister was “unable to engage with us over any potential meeting dates at this time, as they require to carry out further internal work first”.
However, Transport Scotland offered a new explanation on Friday – that because of the Cabinet re shuffle on february 8, ministerial diaries were “under review” and once they were confirmed ,“a date for the meeting and site visit can be arranged”.
Whatever, the real reason, Scottish Conservatives Lothian MSP Sue Webber, who has lodged a parliamentary questionover the delay, criticised the lack of urgency.
She said :" A new railway station for winch burgh is essential for such a fast-growing communityif even more traffic grid lock in west edinburgh is to be avoided, and should fit perfectly with Mr Harvie's aims and beliefs.
"I'd have thought he'd be very keen to do what he could to get the project moving, given it's essential if the Scottish Govern
The Scottish Government moves at the same pace as rush-hour traffic on Queensferry Road Scottish Conservative MSP Sue Webber
ment is to have any chance of reaching its net-zero goals, for which he's responsible.
"It's a very simple request for him to engage with the discussions and I don't understand why it's taking so long to respond. But it seems the Scottish Government moves at the same pace as rush-hour traffic on Queensferry Road."
Transport Scotland said Network Rail’s reports were shared with WDL last year. Mr Harvie told Ms Hyslop on February 10: “Transport Scotland reviewed the design proposals… and pro actively suggested amendments which would see any new station delivered more efficiently.
"Network Rail has revised this proposal in line with Transport Scotland’s suggestions and Network Rail is now able to share the revised proposal with the developer."
WDL said it had only received “two brief statements giving optional design stage costs” with no construction cost estimates. The developer said it could not discuss how much it would contribute to the station until a final design and cost, which it said it had been awaiting for 11 years.
WDL chief executive John Hamilton said :“we have always been prepared to contribute money to a new train station. It will only happen if the Scottish Government and other public bodies partner with us. No private developer can plan, design, fund and approve new stations on the public rail network on their own. We call on the Scottish Government and Mr Harvie to commit to a stakeholder meeting date ur gently so we can finally build some momentum on this vital project.”
A Transport Scotland spokesperson said: “We recognise the case for a station at Winchburgh and remain supportive. All parties must work together to ensure it can happen and we remain committed to playing a full part in that collaboration."
A Network Rail spokesperson said: “We are supporting the development of proposals and providing advice around costs.”