The Scotsman

Conservati­onists urge Holyrood to refuse UK’S biggest offshore wind farm

- Ilona Amos Environmen­t Correspond­ent

Conservati­onists are calling for Scottish ministers to refuse permission to build one of the world’s biggest offshore wind farms due to fears over the risk to fragile seabird population­s.

The proposed wind farm, in the outer Firth of Forth, will have more than 300 giant turbines stretched across an area four times larger than Edinburgh.

If built, the 4.1 gigawatt Berwick Bank “super project” would be the largest offshore wind farm in theuk, capable of powering over six million homes – more than double the number in Scotland. The Scottish Government has set out a goal to deliver up to 11GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030 as part of the national target to reach net zero climate emissions by 2045.

Electricit­y from berwick bank could increase Scotland’s overall renewable energy capacity by almost a third, according to the developer SSE Renewables, which has applied to the Scottish Government’s Energy Consents Unit for planning permission.

But National Trust for Scotland, RSPB Scotland, Scottish Seabird Centre and Scottish Wildlife Trust are concerned about “unacceptab­le damage to nature” posed by the giant scheme, which would be sited around 20 miles from St Abb’s Head national nature reserve, in the Scottish Borders, and Bass Rock, in East Lothian. Those two sites are important breeding grounds for the likes of gannets, puffins, kittiwakes, guillemots, razorbills and puffins, many of which have been declining.

The organisati­ons have written to energy minister Gillian Martin to highlight their worries before a decision on the developmen­t is made. They have criticised the choice of site, which they say is too close to internatio­nally significan­t sea bird colonies and special protection areas.

They have also accused SSE Renewables of failing to include adequate steps to mitigate the threat turbines will pose.

According to surveys, Berwick Bank could have higher seabird death rates than other offshore schemes.

National Trust for Scotland ambassador dr c al major urged ministers to reject the proposal and called for SSE Renewables to move the scheme to a less ecological­ly damaging location.

“Our conservati­on charity supports the expansion of offshore wind farms, which are a vital component of Scotland’s journey to net zero,” she said.

“However, they must be sited in the right places for nature. This location–off stabb’s head with its precious sea bird not the right site.

“Nature and biodiversi­ty are vital assets in tackling climate change and we must make sure we don’t put them at irreversib­le or unnecessar­y risk in transition­ing to net zero.”

Susan Davies, chief executive of the Scottish Seabird Centre, said: “We are facing a nature crisis and must ensure that green energy is secured in ways which do not contribute to further loss.”

A SSE Renewables spokespers­on said: “As part of our consent applicatio­n for Berwick Bank, we have put forward a comprehens­ive package of mitigation and compensato­ry measures and look forward to working with environmen­tal organisati­ons and others as this important project delivers for Scotland.”

 ?? ?? Guillemots are among the seabirds which could be at risk if Berwick Bank goes ahead
Guillemots are among the seabirds which could be at risk if Berwick Bank goes ahead

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom