The Scotsman

Consultati­on on controvers­ial plans to ban ‘conversion therapy’ draws to a close

- Alistair Grant Political Editor

A public consultati­on on controvers­ial plans to ban “conversion therapy” in Scotland has drawn to a close, amid threats of legal action.

The Scottish Government wants to criminalis­e the practice, which sees people attempt to change or suppress the gender identity or sexual orientatio­n of another.

However, the proposals have sparked concerns over the impact on family life, with the Christian Institute warning it is “ready to go to court” over the issue.

Lawyers have also warned the definition of conversion practices set out in the consultati­on document is not “legally coherent”.

In a briefing for journalist­s in January, a Scottish Government official said it would “reflect” on concerns parents could face prosecutio­n if, for example, they do not let their child dress as the opposite gender or take puberty blockers.

Green MSP Maggie Chapman, inset, said banning conversion therapy would be a “landmark” move for equality. She said: “There is nothing therapeuti­c about conversion practices. They are cruel and dangerous and have no place in modern Scotland. Banning them would be a landmark for progress for equality.

“Conversion practices are intended to shame people into changing who they are. Nobody should be told that they are not good enough because of their sexuality or their gender identity.

“Too many people have suffered. I hope that all MSPS will take the time to learn from and listen to the experience of survivors, and that they will stand with them.”

But Alex Salmond’s Alba Party said the plans were “illdefined,contradict­ory, completely unworkable and unnecessar­y given existing legislatio­n”.

The party’s Neale Hanvey said: “While we support the aim of protecting individual­s from harmful practices, we have concerns about the proposed measures outlined by the Scottish Government. We believe that they could excessivel­y intrude on private and family life, as well as impede freedom of expression and religion.”

Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, previously told The Scotsman the plans must not criminalis­e parents.

He said he backed a ban "in principle", but warned: "We can't make the mistakes we made in the GRR [Gender Recognitio­n Reform] Bill, and we can't criminalis­e parents."

He said: "We can't be in a situation where we are criminalis­ing parents. Parents have to, rightly and legitimate­ly, have a knowledge of impacts on their children and b e allowed to do their job as parents, and not have that job taken away from them by the state."

The consultati­on said proposed new criminal offences would address "the most serious and harmful forms of conversion practices”, with jail sentences of up to seven years for the worst offenders.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom