Punitive rates regime risks harmful consequences
◆ Ending Empty Rates Relief ramps up pressure on businesses which are already struggling, writes Moria Gordon
At the beginning of April, Aberdeen City Council scrapped Empty Rates Relief to address budget shortfalls, but this may have unintended consequences, not just for the city, but for businesses across Scotland.
Previously controlled by the Scottish Government, powers to set the parameters of Empty Rates Relief were handed to local authorities from 1 April 2023. Aberdeen City Council immediately removed the openended 100 per cent relief afforded to Listed buildings, and the sixmonth period of 100 per cent relief awarded to industrial premises. Instead, from 1 April 2023, commercial premises across all sectors of the market were allowed Empty Rates Relief for three months at 50 per cent, followed by 10 per cent for the remainder of the period the property remained empty.
Councillors then voted for all Empty Rates Relief to be entirely removed within the city from 1 April 2024.
This is a measure to address a gap in the council’s budget but will just put further pressure on businesses that are already on precarious financial ground. It’s clear that landlords do not want to sit on empty buildings. We are in an era of high costs and subdued economic activity and these buildings are empty as demand does not meet supply; alternative use is not apparent and therefore redevelopment comes at a significant risk and cost.
Councillors aren’t acknowledging the long-term impact of these changes to the property tax regime. Whilst there will clearly be some money generated over the very short term, the sum would pale in comparison to lost rates revenue for the council in the future. For long-term empty property, 90 per cent of rates payable is paid to the local authority for every 10 per cent provided via the relief. As the regime becomes more punitive, landlords are increasingly incentivised to demolish empty buildings to avoid a rates bill, and the existing rates revenue stream will be lost to the area.
At a time when Aberdeen needs inward investment, these moves negatively impact on investor appetite for the city. The city’s approach is also setting a concerning precedent; changes like this to the Scottish rates regime only widens the gap between Scotland and England. England already has a far more favourable business rates regime. The Scottish Government has not made any provisions, whereas Westminster has. For example, the retail, hospitality, and leisure (RHL) sectors in England continue to benefit from 75 per cent rates relief. Nothing equivalent is on the table for businesses on the Scottish mainland.
To put this into context, two buildings with a rateable value of £150,000 in Aberdeen and Newcastle could have very different rates liabilities. In Aberdeen, where there is now no relief, the 2024 annual rates billing would total £83,850. In contrast, the equivalent revenue generated down south would come to less than a fifth of that amount at £15,370.
It appears that all authorities are moving in one direction, with Glasgow City being the most recent council to announce limits to its Empty Rates provisions. With the additional burden these policy changes bring, it is clear to see why investors and businesses are increasingly looking to England