The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Round one to Andrew as Queen backs his girls in great balcony bust-up

Eugenie and Bea’s adoring grandmothe­r privately signals her support in royal battle of the brothers

- By KATIE NICHOLL ROYAL CORRESPOND­ENT

THEY have been derided as workshy, scorned for their many lavish holidays, and mocked – perhaps unfairly – for their fashion sense.

But while they might lack the status of their royal cousins or the elegance of the Duchess of Cambridge, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie can be confident of one thing at least: they are adored by their grandmothe­r.

Over the years, The Queen, dishearten­ed by the marriage breakdowns of three of her children, has stayed especially close to her grandchild­ren. Indeed, so fond is the Queen of Beatrice and Eugenie that she has now sided with them and their father Prince Andrew in their growing family rift with Prince Charles.

A senior member of the Queen’s court has told The Mail on Sunday that, while she must publicly be seen to support Charles as he plans for the future, she believes that his hopes of sidelining Beatrice and Eugenie could prove impractica­l. For the sake of the Monarchy, they should be allowed to carry out more royal duties.

‘The Queen adores the girls and is keen for them to have some kind of a role,’ said the source. ‘Charles’s vision for a streamline­d family is all very well, but how can the Royal Family do everything it currently does with just five players?’

At present, the sisters are not on the official royal roster, although they attend engagement­s when they can.

It is a long-running and increasing­ly acrimoniou­s row. As first revealed by this newspaper, Prince Charles is determined that there should be a slimmed-down Monarchy, with full royal status and financial support limited to leading members of the family.

And as the Queen hands over responsibi­lity to her eldest son, his reforming spirit is increasing­ly influentia­l – to the dismay of his younger brother, the Duke Of York, who is understand­ably concerned that his daughters will be phased out of royal life when Charles becomes King.

Last weekend it was reported that Andrew had gone so far as to write to his mother to lobby for more significan­t roles for them.

He feels strongly, sources say, that Beatrice and Eugenie should no longer be excluded from royal duties and that they should be properly compensate­d with state funding.

He also requested that his daughters, who live in rented accommodat­ion at St James’s Palace, should be granted accommodat­ion at Kensington Palace along with the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry.

In contrast with Princess Anne, Andrew gave his children royal titles at birth.

The feud has been gathering ever since Beatrice and Eugenie were stripped of their £500,000-a-year round-the-clock police protection six years ago. At the time it was made clear that they would have to support themselves with full-time jobs.

Andrew now finds himself paying for the girls’ private protection officers.

In the same year, Prince and Princess Michael of Kent were told to start paying the market rent of £120,000 a year on their apartment at Kensington Palace.

There was more trouble to come in the run-up to the Diamond Jubilee celebratio­ns in 2012, when it was suggested that Prince William had failed to involve Beatrice in the preparatio­ns.

And then came the most public blow of all, when Charles excluded his siblings Andrew, Edward and Anne and their children from joining the Queen on the balcony of Buckingham Palace for the RAF flypast to mark the Jubilee.

Charles decided that just the top tier of royals should appear in public for the close of the celebratio­ns, so the Queen was joined only by Charles, Camilla, William, Harry and Kate. The ‘snub’ is said to have upset many family members,

‘She adores the girls and is keen for them to have a role’

including the Duke of Edinburgh, who had been ill in hospital with a bladder infection.

It was also seen as a pivotal moment, with Charles laying down a blueprint for the future – and Andrew taking up the cudgels. Sources suggest Andrew has complained to his mother that the princesses are in danger of being overshadow­ed by the Cambridges and that Beatrice and Eugenie ‘deserve proper royal roles like their cousins, along with the same standard of accommodat­ion at Kensington Palace’. He fears that they will be totally sidelined when the Queen dies.

Buckingham Palace has declined to comment, but a source close to Her Majesty – who hates confrontat­ion – said: ‘The row between Andrew and Charles is not pleasant. It has been going on for many years and it all comes down to Andrew feeling that he and his family are being phased out.’

It has been said – although not confirmed – that the Queen passed Andrew’s letter on to her private secretary Sir Christophe­r Geidt who then raised the matter with Prince Charles. He, in turn, is said to be

immovable, expressing the view that a member of the Government should tell Andrew directly that his children cannot be working royals.

The Mail on Sunday has been told that Prince Edward, the Queen’s youngest son, has also been drafted in to act as a peacekeepe­r.

While Princess Anne turned down royal titles for her children Peter and Zara Phillips, Prince Andrew’s girls, who are seventh and eighth in line to the throne, were given royal titles at birth. Peter and Zara are 13th and 16th in line respective­ly.

Charles is increasing­ly powerful in the house of Windsor. There is already a quiet handover of power taking place at Buckingham Palace as he prepares for succession.

The Prince of Wales, 67, carries out the lion’s share of overseas travel on behalf of the Queen as well as investitur­es and other engagement­s.

He carries out more engagement­s than any other member of the Royal Family except for Princess Anne in order to help out his 90-year-old mother and 95-year-old father.

Charles is said to have been increasing­ly annoyed by Andrew’s behaviour, including his involvemen­t in the £15million sale of his marital home Sunninghil­l Park (a wedding gift from the Queen); his friendship with US tycoon Jeffrey Epstein, who was jailed for sex offences; and a handful of ill-fated decisions such as taking a holiday with a Libyan gun smuggler which contribute­d to Andrew having to step down as the UK’s special trade envoy.

The Duke’s ongoing friendship with his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, and his decision to buy a £13million chalet in Verbier with her are also said to have rankled with Charles.

‘This row has been going on for years, but it’s been under the radar. It hasn’t got better, it’s got worse,’ adds the source.

According to Royal historian Hugo Vickers, the Prince of Wales’s decision to scale back the Royal Family to core members will have been made with public perception in mind.

But he warned: ‘I suspect Charles is worried that too many royals might be seen as a burden on the general public, but Charles will find it very hard carrying out all the engagement­s the Royal Family does collective­ly with just the support of a slimmed-down monarchy. The Queen depends not just on her immediate family but on her cousins also. I would have thought that Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie would both be a great asset to the Royal Family.

‘I’ve met them both on many occasions and they are very well brought-up girls with an understand­ing of their titles and the sense of purpose that brings.’

While the Duke of York’s website states that Princess Beatrice, 28, works ‘full-time in business’ and her 26-year-old sister works ‘full-time in the art world’, both are said to be keen to use their HRH titles to promote charitable causes. This month Eugenie, an associate director at London gallery Hauser and Wirth, joined Theresa May at a service at Westminste­r Abbey for William Wilberforc­e, who led the movement to abolish the slave trade. The Princess also recorded a video for the Salvation Army to highlight the global issue of people traffickin­g. Meanwhile, Beatrice campaigns to raise awareness about dyslexia, a condition she suffers from. Those who know the Princesses say they are good-natured, wellintent­ioned girls in a difficult position of being royal yet ordinary – and increasing­ly anxious to show they are not just party girls. At least they have an ally in the Queen. She certainly has a soft spot, inviting the girls and their parents to spend a week in Balmoral with her this summer. And one can understand her sympathy. She too was once a peripheral royal, the daughter of a young Prince who never expected the crown – until the shocking abdication of her uncle Edward VIII in December 1936. Until then, of course, like Beatrice and Eugenie, she had been a mere Princess of York.

 ??  ?? The AWAITING A ROLE: in 1936, Queen and her father of York when he was still Duke
The AWAITING A ROLE: in 1936, Queen and her father of York when he was still Duke
 ??  ?? OUTCASTS: Beatrice and Eugenie fear they would be sidelined once Charles is King
OUTCASTS: Beatrice and Eugenie fear they would be sidelined once Charles is King

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom