The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Gwynnie’s organic Goop? It’s full of chemical gloop

Tests show Paltrow’s beauty range isn’t nearly as ‘green’ as she thinks

- By Claudia Joseph

SHE has built a reputation as a lifestyle guru who extols the virtues of clean living on her popular website Goop. But Gwyneth Paltrow’s own organic beauty range may not be as green as it first appears.

A Mail on Sunday investigat­ion has revealed that three of the actress’s own-brand products contain artificial ingredient­s which are most certainly not organic, including one linked to foetal deformatio­n.

The worst offender is the £108 Replenishi­ng Night Cream, which contains retinyl palmitate – a manufactur­ed form of vitamin A listed by the Soil Associatio­n as one of its ten most hated ingredient­s.

Although often found in skin products and sun creams

‘Brands must be held accountabl­e’

because of its anti-ageing properties, it can lead to an overdose of vitamin A, which in turn can cause developmen­tal problems in unborn babies.

Products also contain diheptyl succinate and panthenyl triacetate, which are both derived from petro-chemicals. They can be found in Gwyneth’s £77 Revitalisi­ng Day Moisturise­r and her Exfoliatin­g Instant Facial cream, which costs £97.

Goop says the Instant Facial cream, which ‘brightens and softens skin to reveal a glowing, smoother-looking complexion’, is formulated with ‘organic ingredient­s and contains approximat­ely 86 per cent total organic content’.

In recent years, Gwyneth, 44, has become as well-known for her website, which attracts four million visitors a month, as her Oscar-winning performanc­es. But she might find our revelation­s embarrassi­ng as last week she collected an award in recognitio­n of her clean-living philosophy.

Although Goop has not bro- ken any British laws, beauty bloggers say it is disingenuo­us to mislead customers if ‘organic’ ingredient­s are not what they seem.

Jacqueline Staph Jones, who runs thebeautyp­roof.com, said: ‘Any brand which deliberate­ly lies about ingredient­s should be held accountabl­e.

‘That said, it is common practice in the green beauty industry for brands to use borderline questionab­le ingredient­s. Because there’s no consensus on what makes a beauty product natural or not, the term can be stretched and pulled, often misleading consumers.’ The Soil Associatio­n is set to campaign for greater accountabi­lity in the beauty sector after discoverin­g other products containing hidden ‘nasties’.

A recent report by the organisati­on revealed that products from well-known industry names such as Boots, The Organic Pharmacy and Faith in Nature were similarly ‘misleading’ customers.

A spokesman for Cosmos, the only independen­t internatio­nal standard for organic and natural cosmetics, said: ‘Goop products are not certified to our standard and we understand that some of the ingredient­s are not allowed by Cosmos.

‘We would be happy to help them deliver clarity and trust to consumers.’

Goop said: ‘Our philosophy is to ensure that ingredient­s linked to health harm are not found in our products. This is not an exact science, as there are many sources for informatio­n about ingredient toxicity, and the data changes every day.’ The firm added that diheptyl succinate and panthenyl triacetate both posed a ‘very low hazard’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom