The Scottish Mail on Sunday

IVF chief: We must let women freeze eggs for free on the NHS

Expert demands help for 30 to 35-year-olds to delay motherhood and avert national ‘fertility crisis’

- By Sanchez Manning, Nick Craven and Jake Hurfurt

A LEADING IVF expert today calls on the NHS to provide free egg freezing for childless women in a ‘revolution­ary’ plan to avert Britain’s looming fertility crisis.

Consultant gynaecolog­ist Professor Geeta Nargund argues that her ‘radical action’ – which would cost the Health Service hundreds of millions of pounds – is the only way to protect women’s fertility as increasing numbers delay motherhood for economic or social reasons.

Prof Nargund, in an impassione­d plea to Health Secretary Matt Hancock, argues that her plan for the taxpayer to fund women aged from 30 to 35 to ‘bank’ their eggs would allow thousands to take advantage of a private procedure that costs between £3,000 and £5,000 a time and up to £400 a year to store them.

At present, most women who freeze their eggs do so when they are older than 35, which means the quality is poorer, with a lower chance of fertilisat­ion.

While Prof Nargund admits her plan may seem ‘an expensive luxury’, she claims it could save the NHS money in the long run by improving success rates when the same women later opt for publicly funded IVF treatments, reducing the number of expensive and emotionall­y draining repeat attempts.

Using better quality eggs would also lead to a lower risk of miscarriag­e and chromosome abnormalit­ies, while reducing the need for egg donors, she argues.

Prof Nargund told The Mail on

‘Having more children increases prosperity’

Sunday: ‘We don’t want to deny a whole generation of women from freezing because it’s too expensive. These women are paying into our economy through their National Insurance contributi­ons.

‘How is it fair that they completely shoulder all the costs themselves to the benefit of our society and the economy?

‘The state must take responsibi­lity. Having children is not just for yourself. It is directly benefiting society in its prosperity because without children who is going to pay for pensions?’

Calculatin­g the cost of what Prof Nargund calls a ‘revolution­ary step forward in empowering women’ would depend on the take-up rate. According to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics, an estimated 642,000 women aged between 30 and 35 were childless in 2016.

If all of them opted to have their eggs frozen at a cost of £4,000 each, it would total £2.57billion, equating to an annual cost of £428million.

The annual cost of IVF treatment to the NHS is about £140million and health boards are under increasing financial pressure.

Three cycles of IVF are currently recommende­d by health watchdogs to eligible women under 40.

According to the Human Fertilisat­ion and Embryology Authority, 1,272 women in the UK registered to have IVF treatment without a partner in 2016 – compared with 942 in 2014. In 2016, IVF clinics carried out 1,173 cycles of egg freezing, up ten per cent from the previous year. Prof Nargund, who works at St George’s Hospital in London, has long argued for fertility lessons to be included in the National Curriculum so that teenagers learn about the dangers of delaying parenthood.

Reaction to her call was mixed. Aileen Feeney, chief executive of charity Fertility Network UK, said: ‘Anything that gives women the opportunit­y to preserve their fertility is a good thing and we would absolutely support this.’

Consultant gynaecolog­ist Stuart Campbell, a former professor of obstetrics and gynaecolog­y at St George’s, said: ‘In a way, egg freezing is the last great freedom for women, so economical­ly if it’s important for the country to have a young population then it is worth funding egg freezing on the NHS.

‘The Government should consider making it a policy to help women have babies as young as possible.’

But Adam Balen, professor of reproducti­ve medicine at Leeds NHS Trust and chairman of the Fertility Education Initiative, said: ‘Having children is an economic

benefit to society, and even treatment such as IVF is cost-effective. But I don’t think we’re quite there yet to call on the Government to fund social egg freezing.

‘If the NHS were to fund the recommende­d amount of IVF for everyone, rather than funding one or no cycles, they would have a decent chance of having a baby. But the law at the moment only allows freezing for ten years, so there is a danger if you freeze too young you may not actually be able to use your eggs when you want to.’

Mail on Sunday columnist Dr Ellie Cannon said: ‘I don’t think NHS stakeholde­rs would be keen to be funding egg freezing at the moment. I appreciate this may seem cruel to many women, but I suppose you have to weigh up these things against demands we face every day in the NHS, such as prescribin­g expensive cancer drugs or carrying out costly operations for children with cerebral palsy.

‘In that sort of environmen­t, I am not sure egg freezing can be justified.’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? ‘REVOLUTION­ARY’: Prof Geeta Nargund wants all childless women aged 30-35 to have their eggs frozen
‘REVOLUTION­ARY’: Prof Geeta Nargund wants all childless women aged 30-35 to have their eggs frozen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom