The Scottish Mail on Sunday

Can my military ex sidestep his child support?

Probes a world of scams and scandals

- by Tony Hetheringt­on

Ms K. C. writes: I have been dealing with the Child Maintenanc­e Service (CMS) for two years, and a combinatio­n of its incompeten­ce and the fact that my former partner is in the armed forces, has made things awful. The CMS finally issued a ‘deduction of earnings request’, but the military refuses to comply. Apparently they can do this. My ex now owes more than £5,000 in arrears of maintenanc­e for our son.

LAST year, your former partner, who is serving in the Royal Marines, was earning £719 a week. Based on this, the CMS reckons he should currently be paying £73 a week for the support of his son. However, the payments he was making suddenly dried up last year. It is not quite right, though, to say that the military refused to deduct the money from his pay. But I do understand why you suspect this happened.

Members of the armed forces are not treated in the same way as civilians. The CMS has no legal power to enforce maintenanc­e deductions from the pay of anyone serving in the forces.

The CMS sends a request to the Ministry of Defence (MoD), asking for maintenanc­e payments to be collected. The MoD then contacts the paying parent and his commanding officer.

Your ex-partner has six weeks to respond to the MoD, and during this period he is interviewe­d by his commanding officer, who can tell the MoD if there are any military reasons why the deductions from pay should not be made.

This can result in quite a bit of delay if, for example, the member of the forces is away for operationa­l reasons.

And on top of this, the MoD has the right to rule that members of the forces are entitled to a ‘minimum drawing rate’, ensuring their net pay does not fall below a certain level, regardless of what they should be paying as maintenanc­e.

The MoD actually has a formal agreement with the CMS that covers the way it will honour – or not – child maintenanc­e requests.

But a spokespers­on told me: ‘The MoD continues to abide by the agreement we have in place with the Child

Maintenanc­e Service.’ So what went wrong with your claim? The MoD simply refused to say.

I had more success though, with the Department for Work and Pensions, which oversees the CMS.

Helpful officials there agreed to look back through CMS records, and they found a horrible slip-up late last year.

The CMS should have issued an upto-date payment schedule to the MoD, but failed to do so.

In a nutshell, they sent paperwork to the MoD requesting deductions from your ex-partner’s pay, but without any detailed timetable setting out dates and amounts.

The missing timetable has now been issued and the MoD has confirmed that it has arrived.

It will be in force this month, and arrears of maintenanc­e will be spread out and collected on top of the basic £73 a week. I understand you have also been sent £75 by the CMS as an apology for its mishandlin­g.

A spokesman told me: ‘We apologise that an administra­tive error resulted in missed payments, and we have now made a deduction from earnings request to the Ministry of Defence in order to get payments reinstated.’

 ??  ?? RULES: The MoD has its own agreement with the CMS
RULES: The MoD has its own agreement with the CMS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom