The Scottish Mail on Sunday

I designed Diana ’ s dress on my own – and my ex has dishonestl­y claimed credit for 40 years

Explosive testimony from Elizabeth Emanuel in bitter court battle with former husband

- By Michael Powell

AS A husband-and-wife team, they became the toast of the fashion industry after creating Princess Diana’s extravagan­t ivory silk wedding dress.

But now divorced, David and Elizabeth Emanuel are at war over the gown that made them household names. And in the latest chapter of their increasing­ly bitter dispute, Elizabeth has made the extraordin­ary claim that her ex-husband played no role in its design, and has dishonestl­y taken the credit for decades.

In legal papers filed last week – and seen by The Mail on Sunday – Elizabeth alleges that she designed the dress entirely on her own and accuses David of making ‘frequent false statements to the media and press that he had designed dresses for Princess Diana when he did not’.

She is seeking a court order to stop him from making any claim on the creation of the dress which, with its spectacula­r 25ft train, enthralled a global TV audience of 750million in 1981.

Elizabeth’s broadside comes after 68-yearold David took legal action to stop his ex-wife selling sketches of the dress, claiming she had no right to do so without his consent.

But in her blistering response, she claims that she was the ‘key creative force’ in their relationsh­ip, and that David’s role was merely ‘organisati­on, dealing with clients and overseeing the making of garments by the workroom staff’ to her designs. The court documents

‘I was the key creative force – he just dealt with our clients’

allege that Elizabeth, 67, has been ‘deprived of media interviews and financial revenue’ because the public wrongly think that David designed the dress and not her.

David recently landed a consultanc­y role on Netflix’s hit drama The Crown to help recreate the dress for actress Emma Corrin to wear during wedding scenes opposite Josh O’Connor, who plays Prince Charles.

However, Elizabeth claims she would have been offered the job instead had her ex-husband not spent years falsely claiming to be Diana’s dressmaker. And she alleges he breached her copyright by reproducin­g the wedding dress for the screen without her consent.

It is the latest twist in a case that began when David sued his ex-wife over the auction of sketches of the dress and other garments worn by the Princess of Wales.

The other disputed drawings up for sale include the chiffon blouse with ruff collar and satin that Diana wore for the official engagement photograph Lord Snowdon took for Vogue; the sequined black taffeta evening gown from her first official engagement with Charles in March 1981; a green silk evening gown she wore in 1985; a black and silver dress from the Out Of Africa film premiere in 1986; and a white crepe dress the Princess wore on a Royal tour of the Gulf states the same year. The Welsh designer claimed his ex-wife is selling the sketches without his consent and is seeking damages for a breach of copyright. He has even asked for offending copies of the sketches – which he claims she created from the originals they made together – to be destroyed.

However, in a blistering response filed at the High Court last week, Elizabeth’s lawyers said that her former husband had ‘played no part in the creative process that led to the design drawings. They were not works of joint authorship’.

She claims that David ‘very rarely, if at all, drew any sketches, artwork or created any designs’ during their partnershi­p, which ran from 1978 until their divorce in 1990. The legal papers state that she created the sketches in an upstairs room at their boutique Emanuel Salon, in Brook Street, Mayfair, Central London, while her husband worked in a room downstairs.

Elizabeth also claims that her ex-husband could not have been the creator of Diana’s extravagan­t wedding dress because his design style is ‘simple and classic’ while she has ‘an innovative avant-garde dramatic romantic style’.

David is often introduced on TV as the designer of Diana’s wedding

dress – or as one American broadcaste­r recently declared, ‘the genius behind that gown’. In her legal claim, Elizabeth accused her ex-husband of taking credit for her designs in media interviews ‘knowing them to be false and/or reckless as to the truth’, and claiming he knows that she ‘solely created all the designs for Princess Diana’.

The couple met while studying at Harrow College of Art in the mid1970s, before both then completed master’s degrees in fashion at the Royal College of Art in London.

They set up their Mayfair couture house and had two children, Oliver and Eloise, before their marriage broke down acrimoniou­sly. For years they have communicat­ed only through their children and lawyers.

David Emanuel declined to comment last night.

 ??  ?? DISPUTED: Diana in her gown. Left: The couple in talks with the Princess
DISPUTED: Diana in her gown. Left: The couple in talks with the Princess
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom