The Sentinel

TRIAL CUTTING NUMBER OF ON-CALL FIREFIGHTE­RS SET TO BE EXTENDED

- Kerry Ashdown kerry.ashdown@reachplc.com

A TRIAL of reduced crew numbers for on-call firefighte­rs is set to be extended.

Staffordsh­ire Fire and Rescue Service began piloting the scheme, which reduces the minimum crew for a retained appliance from four to three firefighte­rs, last year.

Safety concerns have been raised by several councillor­s however – and representa­tives of the Fire Brigades Union have spoken out about the proposals.

But at the latest Police, Fire and Crime Panel meeting, Staffordsh­ire’s commission­er Ben Adams said the trial is going ‘extremely positively’.

He added that no safety concerns have been reported. Mr Adams said: “The service has a really rigorous formal process for reporting safety concerns when you’re out on an incident; if there had been one, there would have been a report on it.

“Nationally, the Fire Brigades Union do not like this. Nationally their stated position is they will never like it.

“Locally, their members support it. I would appreciate if people who are lobbying on this gave a balanced view so that people could make a decision that is informed, not misinforme­d.

“I am absolutely sure, if we asked the public ‘do you think it’s a good idea these teams are attending’, they would say yes, providing it’s safe.

“It means availabili­ty is improved and the capability, the experience, the job satisfacti­on, the reason to be and stay an on-call firefighte­r is greatly enhanced by being out doing the work.”

But Stoke-on-trent city councillor David Williams said: “I note the comments about the FBU lobbying Government – they’re quite right to do so because we’ve lost 12,000 firefighte­rs since 2010.

“We certainly need more urgent investment in recruitmen­t, and perhaps that’s why we’re having the debate around safe staffing levels 14 years on.

“I think it’s also important to recognise the FBU’S decades of experience, which can’t be brushed under the carpet here. The report says, in general, on-call teams feel

safe – but then a couple of paragraphs later it goes on to say ‘many on-call firefighte­rs have not yet experience­d being mobilised as a crew of three’.

“It seems a little bit early in the day to make the statements that on-call teams feel safe. I think it would also be useful for panel members to see more detail and reports moving forward.

“It also says in the report that communitie­s expect firefighte­rs to attend as quickly as possible. Absolutely right they do, but I think residents across the county and city also expect firefighte­rs not to put their safety at risk.”

Councillor Charlotte Atkins, referring to a meeting attended by Mr Adams in the Staffordsh­ire Moorlands, said: “When you were questioned at Staffordsh­ire Moorlands, you were being questioned by a retired firefighte­r.

“The reason he was very concerned about three-person crews is because he understand­s the motivation of firefighte­rs.

“If they see people in danger, they will go in even though perhaps, for their own safety, they should hold back and wait for back-up. I think he’s concerned that if this becomes a more general operationa­l model, firefighte­rs will go in because that’s their motivation; to tell a three-person crew that they have to wait probably doesn’t work tremendous­ly well when you have got people who are very determined to save lives.”

A report containing data, feedback and options for next steps was considered by the service in December – six months after the trial began.

A report to the Police, Fire and Crime Panel said: “In addition to the staff feedback, the data clearly shows an improvemen­t in our response times of circa nine minutes and 45 seconds ahead of the next fullycrewe­d appliance, and therefore an improvemen­t to the service that is being provided to the community.”

A proposal to extend the trial for another 12 months, until the end of 2024, has been backed by the service. But it was also agreed that the public would need to be consulted before a final decision was made on whether to make the working practice a permanent one.

 ?? ?? Councillor­s and FBU have voiced safety fears
Councillor­s and FBU have voiced safety fears

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom