MOBILE GIANTS’ RAPE DISGRACE
Sex attack victims forced to pay bills for phones being held by detectives
Rape victims are being forced to keepp paying for mobile phones seized by police dur ing inquiries, we can reveal.
Support charities yesterday said many victims had to pay contract fees for months, even years, while they waited for their cases to reach court and accused the phone firms of making “deeply unethical” profits.
Victims of sexual violence have described how they have tried in vain to halt contracts for phones being held by investigators as potential evidence. Seizure of phones by police wanting to access victims’ personal data had already prompted concern women will become more reluctant to report rapes.
Sandy Brindley, of Rape Crisis Scotland, said the process to stop contracts can be long, torturous and distressing and called for phone firms and police to issue clear procedures and do more to help victims of sexual assaults.
She said: “To profit from these serious and traumatic situations is deeply unethical, yet we hear time and time again that survivors waste hours on the phone to mobile providers trying unsuccessfully to reach the right person.”
Police took the phone used by the man who raped me but, for months, I had to pay for it. Why?
– Rape victim urges action
Mobile firms are billing rape victims whose phones have been retained by police as evidence during lengthy criminal investigations.
Victims of sexual violence are being forced to spend hundreds of pounds for devices that are in the hands of investigators as support groups demand urgent action to halt the billing.
Rape Crisis Scotland has accused companies of making “deeply unethical” profits by not pausing payments on contracts of phones held for examination by detectives, often for many months.
The charity said rape survivors have been left without their phones for years in some cases while forced to continue paying monthly bills. And many have said trying to end contracts for phones held by police is a torturous, protracted process. One woman supported by Rape Crisis Scotland had two mobile phones taken by Police Scotland in spring 2014, but the trial for her case was not held until July 2018. Police Scotland has also been criticised for not having specific guidelines on how victims’ phones should be handled during investigations.
The suggestion that cases might not proceed unless victims hand over personal data from their phones and how that data might be used by defence lawyers has provoked fears women might be deterred from reporting attacks.
The Scottish force says it asks for mobile phone data from rape complainants when it is “necessary and appropriate” but Rape Crisis Scotland said there was an “apparent lack of process”.
Sandy Brindley, of Rape Crisis Scotland, said that, although phones are often returned in an acceptable time frame, some survivors have had devices held for months, sometimes years.
She added: “There are several key issues here: first is the practical inconvenience of suddenly being without a device that most of us rely on every day for our calendar, our contacts, our communication and more – with no guarantee or even reliable estimation as to when it will be returned.
“This increases the risk of isolation at a time where a compassionate support network is so important to a survivors’ wellbeing.
“Secondly there is the financial burden whereby phone companies in our view have a responsibility to, at the very least, pause payment on a phone contract until it is safely back in the hands of the owner.
“To profit from these serious and traumatic situations is deeply unethical, yet we hear time and time again that survivors waste hours on the phone to mobile providers trying unsuccessfully to reach the right person to alleviate this burden.” Asked what procedures were in place for seeking consent to access a mobile phone, Police Scotland said: “The treatment of any information provided to the police by victims or witnesses is generally voluntary.
“On this basis, police officers will seize the item in a manner that is consistent with the force expectation to which any individual’s property would be signed over.”
However, Ms Brindley said there should be a transparent process to reassure people.
“For any one of us, the idea of having your phone seized and searched – with no transparent procedural parameters around what is on/ off limits – is deeply unpleasant and can leave a feeling of intense vulnerability,” she added.
“The prospect of having intimate and personal photos and correspondence on their phone accessed by the police can even put people off reporting in the first place.
“No one expects that reporting rape will be easy and phones are often a necessary part of an investigation, but at the very least survivors should be able to expect there will be clear, transparent processes around the length of time that phones will be taken and what will be accessed.”
Assistant Chief Constable Gillian Macdonald of Police Scotland said the length of time mobile telephones are retained are specific to individual investigations.
She added: “We recognise the inconvenience this may cause and
are working with partners to address this. We have proposals to introduce cyber kiosks that would help speed up this process, and in some cases prevent the need to retain devices.
“We are working with stakeholders to design and implement an improved method of capturing the informed consent of victims and witnesses.
“As a direct result of feedback received from victims, guidance was issued to our specially trained Sexual Offences Liaison Officers about liaising with mobile phone providers, on behalf of victims to prevent unnecessary costs being incurred.” In England and Wales, digital consent forms asking for permission to access information including emails, messages and photos have been rolled out this year, but critics said this could stop victims coming forward.
The forms state victims will be given the chance to explain why they do not want to give police consent to access their data. But they are also advised that, if they refuse, it may not be possible for the investigation or prosecution to continue. Yesterday, as campaigners called for the police and mobile firms to review procedures, communications watchdogs promised to investigate.
Ja n e Rumble, director of consumer policy at Ofcom, said: “We’re extremely concerned by these reports. This practice is wholly inconsistent with how we expect mobile companies to treat people in vulnerable circumstances, and I will be raising this with mobile companies as a priority.”
Last month, Scottish Justice
Secretary Humza Yousaf promised to do more for victims of sexual violence as figures suggest it is the fastest- rising category of crime in Scotland and has the lowest conviction rate.
He met victims of rape to discuss the not proven verdict and how complaints could be handled better. Later, the Justice Secretary said: “More than one described how being left in the dark about how her case was progressing left her feeling unable to move on with her life. “Others, however, raised wider concerns about how juries make decisions and the verdicts available.”
There have been a number of initiatives launched to improve how rape victims are treated by police and prosecutors but support charities say progress has been painfully slow. However, Mr Yousaf insisted things are getting better, saying: “We must keep the momentum going.” Mobile phone firms yesterday said procedures to deal with customers who became victims of crime were already in place. Vo d a f o n e U K said: “Thank you for raising this important issue with us. We are happy to discuss this with Rape Crisis Scotland. We have specific processes in place to help vulnerable customers and will always try to assist customers, including the suspension of charges where relevant.”
EE said: “We agree fully with Rape Crisis Scotland that survivors, who are already dealing with so much, should not have to deal with the inconvenience and cost that comes with having their phone taken away during an investigation, which is why we have policies in place to help our customers in these difficult circumstances.
“When a customer tells us their phone is retained by the police, we suspend their bill and provide another phone and number if needed.
“Once they receive their own handset back from the police, we’ll continue to support them, including changing their phone or mobile number if necessary. We encourage all customers to contact us if they ever need help and support.”
Tesco Mobile said: “Customer care is a top priority for Tesco Mobile, especially during difficult circumstances. We work to understand how we can support each individual customer, and in similar instances in the past we have offered a replacement phone whilst their phone is with the police.
“We have also recently launched our Additional Support Team, who are dedicated to helping customers that are in a vulnerable situation.”