Take care when shopping on the world wide web
SHOPPING isn’t as simple as it used to be.
Nowadays, when you make a purchase online, it sometimes isn’t entirely clear who you have bought the goods from.
Some websites aren’t, entirely, shops themselves. A huge internationally-recognised brand like Amazon, for example, is styled as a “marketplace” where shoppers and sellers meet.
As is true of a street market, you could be said to have bought an item from the market – but also from a trader who has a stall at the market.
The law, however, gives some protection to customers.
If you buy an item from Amazon you have broadly the same rights as if you’d bought it in your local shop.
If the purchase isn’t fit for purpose, or damaged, or breaks soon after you have begun using it, then you are entitled to your money back.
There can be twists in the road, however.
Alex Wright’s wife Mary bought him an Ostech Dual OS tablet computer on January 7 last year. It cost £73.99.
However, by the end of February, the Ostech wasn’t doing well. Soon, it gave up the ghost altogether.
In March, Alex attempted to follow the procedure on the Amazon website – which appeared to tell him, in the first instance, to contact the seller. And Alex did try to do this, to the best of his ability.
But the seller’s address was given as No.61 Shek Kwu Lung, Taipo, Hong Kong.
Alex emailed and filled in the “contact form” on the website on numerous occasions over the next four months. He got nowhere. Alex had the presence of mind, however, to take a few screengrabs from his PC which showed the dates of his attempts.
He also contacted Amazon on several occasions, asking for advice. Its operatives kept telling him to contact the seller. They, strangely, gave him the address of a carrier who had delivered the original package. This turned out to be of no use at all.
Alex then turned his attention fully to Amazon. He had tried, as instructed, to contact the seller, but to no avail. He wanted his money back and felt Amazon should stump up.
By this time, however, it was August and well past Amazon’s 90-day money-back guarantee. And Amazon stuck to this line unwaveringly. Alex, who lives in Leamington Spa, tried everything he knew, demanding to speak to managers and head office, but was getting nowhere. He turned to Raw Deal. Initially, we didn’t get very far either.
Amazon insisted its procedure hadn’t been followed and, therefore, Alex wasn’t due a refund. It took quite a bit of
arguing and repeated assertions that Alex had, indeed, contacted Amazon within 90 days but had been sidetracked into trying to deal directly with the Hong Kong company.
The clincher was Alex’s screengrabs.
They proved he had told (or attempted to tell) the firm’s website his tablet wasn’t working and the dates showed that this process began well within Amazon’s guarantee period. Amazon agreed to fix it. Alex told us: “I’ve heard from Amazon. The seller has agreed to give a full refund as soon as it receives the faulty tablet.
“I wish to thank you wholeheartedly for doing something that seemed almost impossible.
“I tried and tried but all I got was passed back and forth by Amazon. It was adamant that I was not getting anything – the tablet repaired or a refund.
“But, thanks to you, I am getting my refund.”