The Sunday Post (Newcastle)

Ruth may be in Vogue but all talk, no action is never a good look

- By Mandy Rhodes MANDY RHODES IS EDITOR OF HOLYROOD MAGAZINE www.holyrood.com FOLLOW ON TWITTER @holyroodma­ndy

Ruth Davidson is on a roll. Last week, the leader of the Scottish Conservati­ves was named one of Vogue’s 25 most influentia­l women in Britain.

The accolade came just days after senior Tories at Westminste­r were touting Davidson as the saviour of their party.

And then there was her big speech on the economy. It was billed as a chance to reset the dial. An opportunit­y to grasp policy detail and set out plans to close the gap between the haves and the have-nots. To make a difference.

This is the divided Britain Davidson has helped redefine and, as someone consistent­ly tipped for the top, she is also integral to Brexit which has shifted the whole axis of how we in Britain relate to each other and the world.

For while she describes herself as a liberal Tory and appears soft on immigratio­n, strong on human rights and a champion of equality, she is complicit with a party that has tolerated racism and Islamophob­ia within its ranks, is in hock to the DUP and has implemente­d pugnacious immigratio­n policies that have led to scandals such as Windrush.

Last week’s speech was classic Davidson. It offered little in the way of real economic argument, it was more a series of negative observatio­ns about the property market, productivi­ty and population. While many result from the adverse consequenc­es of Conservati­ve policies, Davidson was astute enough to know what would make the headlines.

She is brilliant at feeling the public pulse and claiming an idea as her own. And so it was that the next day, her statements about NHS funding and getting rid of immigratio­n targets splashed.

But she can talk soft on immigratio­n, on Brexit and in support of the NHS but they’re just words and her inaction speaks of something else.

On the “rape clause”, Brexit, racism within her party, a Westminste­r power grab, abortion in Northern Ireland and the deleteriou­s policies of the DUP, Davidson is an expert in political contortion.

She plays to an audience. And it is testament to her political sleight of hand that she is regarded by a metropolit­an commentari­at, and its conscious myopia, as being divorced from all of the toxicity of the Tories.

But nothing encapsulat­es her ability to ignore the reality of her party, more neatly than on immigratio­n and in the case of Denzel Darku.

Darku, a 23-year-old charity worker and student nurse from Ghana who came to Scotland when he was 15 and now lives in Paisley, has been told by the Home Office he must leave.

He has been educated here, been an elected member of the Scottish Youth Parliament and carried the Queen’s baton ahead of Glasgow’s Commonweal­th Games in 2014. He is, the First Minister told the Scottish Parliament on Thursday, a “credit to Scotland.”

Darku may be exceptiona­l but he should not be an exception to a bad rule. His situation and others like it provide the real test of Davidson’s political commitment.

The fanciful imaginings of the Westminste­r media bubble only bolsters Davidson’s profile when scrutiny of her actions, not words, is more important than another speculativ­e prediction of her gilded route to Number 10.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom