Saw nothing. Said nothing. Did nothing
The failure Minister and surgeons apologise to victims The demand Women call for Scots patients’ champion
Mesh victims have called on the Scottish Government to appoint a Patients’ Commissioner after a landmark report laid bare their betrayal by a system meant to protect them.
The victims, whose lives have been ruined by the aftermath of implant procedures, urged ministers to appoint a patients’ champion to investigate complaints and hold organisations to account.
The appointment of a patients’ commissioner was a key recommendation in a report by Baroness Julia Cumberlege which exposed how the women fought in vain to highlight their plight. Victims say the report was vindication after years of being patronised, dismissed and ignored by doctors and officials.
Six years ago, Scotland became one of the first countries to suspend the use of mesh but reintroduced it after an official review. Yesterday, Baroness Cumberlege told The Sunday Post: “Scotland has the opportunity to lead the world once more.”
The author of a report into the mesh scandal has called on the Scottish Government to appoint a Patient Safety Commissioner.
Baroness Julia Cumberlege urged Health Secretary Jeane Freeman to enlist a patients’ champion to help ensure no others are treated like mesh-injured women.
Publishing a report into the health scandal, she said she would “take to the grave the horrific stories of suffering and avoidable injury” endured by mesh victims.
She exposed a litany of failure in her report – called First Do No Harm, a promise in the Hippocratic Oath sworn by student doctors – after hearing how women suffering lifechanging injuries following mesh procedures were, for years, told their cases were an exception. In fact, up to 25% of implants caused problems but no proper record was kept.
The baroness urged Scotland to lead the way and show the rest of the UK how best to protect patients from medical scandals which she said had devastated far too many lives.
She praised mesh survivors and the politicians who supported them in almost a decade of campaigning which resulted in Scotland becoming the first country in the world to suspend the use of mesh, which has injured hundreds of thousands of women. Urging them to continue the fight to prevent further harm to women from the controversial implants to treat bladder problems and prolapse after childbirth, Baroness Cumberlege said: “Scotland has an opportunity to lead the world once more and take the actions needed to protect patients properly.”
The baroness, a former health minister who has led a number of health reviews, said the experiences of campaigners in Scotland played a major role in her 277-page report which laid bare the systemic failures that allowed scandals such as mesh and the devastation inflicted by drugs which caused birth defects, to continue for years.
She said of her nine-point plan for change: “I hope our recommendations provide a template for Scotland, and other countries, to implement them and bring the change they decide are best for them to ensure these tragedies never happen again.” Baroness Cumberlege said a Patient Safety Commissioner would be a patient’s “first port of call”, someone to hold the system to account, monitor trends and demand action.
During two years of research, the baroness and her team twice came to Scotland to meet mesh victims. She said: “My report is focused on England and my recommendations officially apply there. However, the Scottish women and their evidence played a substantial role and my hope is that Scotland will adopt my recommendations and ensure patients are listened to.”
Included among her recommendations are calls for an official government apology for women damaged by mesh implants and the two drugs which have been linked to birth defects, sodium valproate and Primodos; a shake-up of the medicines regulatory system; a redress agency funded by government and industry to provide future support for damaged patient; specialists care centres; a register or database for implants and procedures; and a General Medical Council register to include a list of financial and non-pecuniary interests for doctors as well as those with clinical interest and specialisms.
She has also called for task forces to be set up to implement them.
Campaigners have welcomed the report, and former Health Secretary Alex Neil, who in 2014 was first to take the decision to suspend the use of mesh, said: “Scotland needs its own Patient Commissioner, someone completely independent who can be a voice who must be listened to, someone with powers to take swift action and compel compliance, someone with a much wider role than just safety.
“Scotland needs its own medicines and devices regulatory body because for many years and in light of the many medical scandals such as mesh, the UK’s current bodies such as the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) are clearly not fit for purpose. Scotland did lead the way on mesh and I’m extremely proud of that, and it was because I listened to what those patients were telling me.”
Just days before the Cumberlege Report was published, the MHRA, the UK watchdog, was asked to remove mesh guidance from its website. It described the implants, which have seen thousands of women suffering life-changing injuries, as having caused a “few” women complications. The baroness said: “We immediately contacted the MHRA and the guidance was removed.
“The MHRA really does need a overhaul. They must think about how they can put patients at the centre of all that they do, and they must listen to what patients are telling them.”
Women injured by mesh say they have just one concern about the Cumberlege Report – that without an outright ban on the devices, the implants will return – including the most difficult to remove which have caused the worst injuries.
David Short, head of litigation at top law firm Balfour Manson, who has represented mesh injured women, said: “The review team have not missed a trick and their finding that the health care system is disjointed, soiled, unresponsive and defensive reflects the reality of the current regime.”
MHRA said: “We take this report and its findings extremely seriously. We recognise that patient safety must be continually protected.”