The Sunday Telegraph

How primates can still steal the limelight, as well as the blackcurra­nt

- Homo sapiens 2001: A Space Odyssey? JULIET SAMUEL FOLLOW Juliet Samuel on Twitter @CitySamuel; READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

What did a 29-stone gorilla do when he escaped his London Zoo enclosure? He hit the juice. The silverback guzzled five litres of undiluted blackcurra­nt squash before being sedated and put back in his cell. It might be behaviour worth of an unruly toddler, but primates fascinate us. Another of our evolutiona­ry forebears, an orang-utan, stole the headlines this week after being snapped hunting for figs in the jungles of Borneo.

As it happens, I’ve been to another part of that jungle and seen orangutans there. While visiting a friend in Jakarta after university, we took a boat trip down a river in Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). The first day was spent listening to the sounds of chainsaws as the rainforest was hacked down around us. On the third day, we turned up a smaller tributary and the water went from foggy to clear. Why was that, I asked our guide. It turned out that much of the river was downstream from a goldmine, which regularly dumped its waste into the waters, turning it cloudy. We’d finally reached an unpolluted part of the watercours­e.

The orang-utans were strange and interestin­g – swinging and falling their way from tree to tree in a movement both athletic and lumbering. They lived in a semi-wild state in a national park, studied and fed copious piles of fruit by a group of scientists led by Biruté Mary Galdikas, a Canadian Jane Goodall. On their feeding platform, the leading male, a complacent, obese creature, would scoff his fill first until he was almost comatose, then heave himself up into the canopy and digest, like an ageing uncle after Christmas lunch.

During the sunset boat ride back, I was astonished to find the trees filled with monkeys, visible as far as I could see along the river. They weren’t chattering and fighting, but sitting peacefully in little groups on branches overlookin­g the water, their long, bluish tails hanging below them as they gazed into the dusk.

Monkeys, we were told this week, can produce stone tools that archaeolog­ists had, until now, always credited exclusivel­y to humans. The monkeys don’t actually use the tools, but make them as a by-product of smashing rocks, whose dust they like to eat. This human-like behaviour by primates has thrown into doubt widely accepted tenets of evolutiona­ry science.

This keeps happening. Some years ago, geneticist­s at the Harvard/MIT Broad Institute (one of whom, I should disclose, is my brother-in-law, David Reich) discovered DNA evidence to suggest that human and chimp ancestors might have interbred for thousands of years. This challenged the idea that humans and chimps split off from each other cleanly on different evolutiona­ry tracks, as had been previously assumed.

A few years after that, another genetic study by the same scientists further challenged our idea of

as uniquely clever beasts. The data suggested that, after moving out of Africa and coming across Neandertha­ls, humans had interbred with them, too. And there’s a growing body of evidence to suggest that Neandertha­ls weren’t the dumb, grunting creatures of Hollywood lore, but were capable of conceptual thought and possibly even religious rituals involving mysterious piles of stalactite­s.

Our surprise at these discoverie­s just goes to show how attached we are to the myths of creationis­m, even if we think we’re modern. Darwin’s theory has been accepted in the West, but we keep searching for that moment, that line in the sand, when humans stopped being animals and became, instead, that special creature made in God’s image. Was it with the appearance on Earth of a strange alien monolith that apes suddenly picked up and used tools, as Stanley Kubrick imagined in

Was it when we finally stood fully upright and donned loincloths? Was it when we invented sponge cake?

Or perhaps evolution isn’t a linear, teleologic­al story, but a messy, chaotic process full of dead ends, switchback­s and lulls, arriving at the modern blackcurra­nt juice-swilling gorilla and his cousin, the juice-guzzling toddler.

Humans are unique, of course, but only in being a particular­ly advanced breed of animal. I find it helpful to remember that when I witness the strange, imitative mating rituals of the flirting couple, the prowling, chestthrus­ting postures of the presidenti­al candidate or the vicious squabbling of young children. The wonder is not how far we’ve come. The wonder is how savage we still are.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom