The Sunday Telegraph

Britain must fight back when Brussels makes unreasonab­le demands

-

SIR – Your leader (February 11) is right: it’s about time Britain started calling the shots in the Brexit talks, rather than absorbing like a soft sponge everything that Michel Barnier throws at us.

Our divorce bill should not be seen as a given, and Mr Barnier should be reminded of the true meaning of negotiatio­n. So far, according to his definition, it has meant a list of EU demands and threats, rather than compromise and mutual understand­ing.

Wesley Hallam

Ubley, Somerset

SIR – It is clear that Mr Barnier is negotiatin­g on behalf of the EU project, rather than for the benefit of the EU’s citizens.

They, like citizens in Britain, will lose out if an effective trade deal is not achieved. However, the unelected bureaucrat­s in Brussels are more concerned about preserving the bloc.

This attitude is partly responsibl­e for the situation in Greece, Spain and Portugal, where unemployme­nt levels are unacceptab­ly high.

Robert Sharp

East Grinstead, West Sussex

SIR – With Brexit, it was always obvious that we could not have our cake and eat it – so why the anger when Mr Barnier spells this out?

All the forecasts commission­ed by the Government show that, whether Brexit is hard, soft, or in-between, this country will be worse off for the next 15 years. Brexiteers must face this fact.

Valerie Crews

Beckenham, Kent

SIR – I agree with Janet Daley (Comment, February 11) that the EU is panicking. She is also right to say: “Brussels expects submission. The British do not submit.”

May I suggest that Leave-supporting organisati­ons across the country unite to mount a media campaign, using these words as their slogan?

Mark Hicks

Gloucester

SIR – What, precisely, is the purpose of this “period of transition” for Brexit? It will simply compound the muddle we are already in, and make leaving even harder when the time finally comes.

We must make a clean break by March 2019.

Richard Fagan

Gerrards Cross, Buckingham­shire

SIR – I voted for Brexit because it was the only option for those of us who wanted to see a reformed EU.

I had hoped that Britain would negotiate a Norwegian-type arrangemen­t that would allow us to remain in the European Economic Area, with the possibilit­y of rejoining the EU at a later date if it made the necessary reforms.

Although the majority of the electorate voted for Brexit, it is mistaken to interpret this as a mandate for a clean break from Europe.

Hugh Foster

Farnboroug­h, Hampshire

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom