The Sunday Telegraph

We’re on a fast track to £100bn white elephant

- By Liam Halligan Channel 4, Monday Feb 11, 8pm

The world’s first commercial railway opened in 1830, from Manchester to Liverpool. For over a century, though, the UK hasn’t built a major route north of London.

The case for HS2 – the proposed high-speed link from the capital to Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds – is rooted, perhaps, in a sense of national greatness lost. If France, Germany and Japan can have high-speed rail, why not the UK? Yet over the 10 years since the project was launched, the underlying HS2 business rationale has kept shifting.

With a top speed of 250mph, the main attraction was a near halving of journey times between London and the North. That argument was undermined by growing internet connectivi­ty, facilitati­ng work on trains. The case shifted to capacity – but the London-to-Birmingham route is already well-served, with trains on average only 43pc full.

More recently, HS2 has been sold as a way of addressing the North-South divide. Over the past two months, though, while making a Dispatches documentar­y to be broadcast tomorrow, I’ve heard much testimony challengin­g that argument, too. With special track and rolling stock, high-speed rail is hugely expensive.

HS2 cost estimates have ballooned from £33billion to £56billion. Industry insiders put the eventual bill above £100billion, which would make HS2 the most expensive railway ever built. Numerous experts told me there are far better ways to spend public money on trains. Cost-benefit analysis suggests investing instead in better links into and between our big Northern cities – so-called “Northern Powerhouse Rail”. That could promote genuine regional prosperity by creating an alternativ­e UK growth centre beyond the South East.

With passenger dissatisfa­ction across the rail network at a 10-year high, reflecting near-record delays, higher returns are more likely investing not in high-speed rail but humdrum commuter routes.

Spending on HS2, around £4billion to date, is about to crank up – to £4.2billion a year for the next 10 years as serious constructi­on begins. Amid spiralling costs, I learnt that a growing group of Cabinet ministers are “increasing­ly minded to kill off HS2”. Their logic is that, given the need to see off Corbyn, quick upgrades to local commuter services used by millions of voters daily are a far better investment than an expensive high-speed route taking a decade or more to deliver.

“HS2: The Great Train Robbery” Dispatches,

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom