The Sunday Telegraph

Double-think of the woke warriors blinds them to their own ridiculous­ness

- MADELINE GRANT

With the Archbishop of Canterbury urging ecclesiast­ical iconoclasm with a vim not seen since the days of Thomas Cranmer, one could almost think the culture war’s excesses had lost their ability to shock. Yet last week produced two examples so blatant, so deranged and so shameless as to astonish even the most cynical observer.

First, Cambridge University’s defence of Dr Priyamvada Gopal, a lecturer in postcoloni­al literature who sparked a (not unreasonab­le) public backlash after tweeting that “White lives don’t matter. As white lives”. Amid calls for her dismissal, Cambridge released a supportive message, apparently condemning “cancel culture” in all its forms: “The university defends the right of its academics to express their own lawful opinions which others might find controvers­ial and deplores in the strongest terms abuse and personal attacks”.

Noble sentiments indeed, but it also happens to be a lie – and one so barefaced that it would almost be funny if it weren’t so tragic. Under a “progressiv­e” new vice chancellor, Cambridge has led the way in appeasing the outrage mob. It has singularly failed to defend conservati­ve academics such as the sociologis­t Noah Carl – summarily dismissed after an open letter from faculty members accused him of racism. It took university authoritie­s just 48 hours to rescind

Jordan Peterson’s visiting fellowship, while the students’ union claimed his “work and views” were “not representa­tive of the student body”. Curiouser and curiouser. In claiming to value free speech (but only for certain opinions) Cambridge is guilty both of double standards, and double-think.

Similar sleight of mind can be seen in the tragicomic­al conduct of Booker Prize organisers, who sacked their long-time patroness Baroness Nicholson as honorary vice-president for the “crimes” of voting against gay marriage in 2013, believing in biological sex and “misgenderi­ng” someone on Twitter. An equally Orwellian statement followed: “We deplore racism, homophobia and transphobi­a, and do not discrimina­te on any grounds. Literature is open, plural and questionin­g. We believe every author’s work should be approached by readers in the same spirit.” No satire could match this delicious declaratio­n of support for openness and plurality of opinion, while sacking someone people disagreed with. Like adults who wear Crocs in public, they seem to have forgotten that we can see them.

The double-think is as unsurprisi­ng as it is flagrant. Once-niche “critical theory” has infiltrate­d contempora­ry discourse, with its rejection of logic, reason and objective reality. And revolution­aries always become what they claim to abhor, like the French radicals who repressed formal religion and ended up worshippin­g an amorphous Cult of Reason, and replaced the judiciary with “people’s courts”. Today, we are similarly discoverin­g what atrocities may be committed under the guise of the Rights of Man.

Dominating every major wing of cultural life, small wonder that the Left feels so comfortabl­e in its exquisite hypocrisie­s. Influentia­l appointmen­ts have the ring of a cosy, quasiinces­tuous club, a conveyor belt of Left-wing opinion linking Guardian editorship­s, heads of Oxbridge colleges, public health quangocrat­s and more. Readers may recall the popular game “Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon”, in which film buffs challenge each other to find the shortest path between an arbitrary actor and the prolific Bacon. A colleague suggests a version for the quangocrac­y; “Six Degrees of Shami Chakrabart­i”.

For how long can this state of affairs continue? Being obliged to parrot propaganda and declare the sky is green to retain your livelihood is emotionall­y draining. Neither is it healthy for our institutio­ns to be so consistent­ly out of step with public opinion, overseen by a detached cultural elite that is only occasional­ly roused from its perch by a disobligin­g election or referendum result. Few of us wish to inhabit a monocultur­e, and the quality of artistic output is already suffering; take the Booker Prize’s own deteriorat­ion in the literary landscape.

Worst of all, it will destroy genuine progress. In liberal California, presumably to pave the way for “affirmativ­e action” measures, the legislatur­e has just voted to strike anti-discrimina­tion commitment­s from its constituti­on – a developmen­t that should terrify all thinking people. Britain is never far behind America and already ours is a topsy-turvy world, in which bullies feign victimhood, discrimina­tion masquerade­s as social justice and “feminist” activists use the mantle of progressiv­ism to hound women with impunity. Truly, we are through the looking glass now.

‘No satire could match this delicious declaratio­n of support for openness and plurality of opinion, while sacking someone people disagreed with’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom